曼哈顿中有关parallelsim一处不懂

lotuswarlock

大家好，新人，第一次发帖。
有句如下：
She argues THAT the agency acts WITH reckless abandon AND WITH disregard for human life AND property, AND THAT it should therefore be shut down.

其他都懂。但是关于介词对仗，为什么两个WITH要对仗，但是for就不要对仗呢？WITH和for一样都是介词啊。为什么不是WITH disregard for human life and for property....

不知道我有没有表达清楚。。。

心有林夕一点通

She argues THAT the agency acts WITH reckless abandon (for human life and property) AND WITH disregard for human life AND property, AND THAT it should therefore be shut down.

3 levels of parallelism:

human life===property
with reckless abandon===with disregard
that the agency ...===that it should ...

lotuswarlock

回复：心有林夕一点通。
谢谢您的解释。不过我的疑惑还是没有消除。
我的问题是，为什么WITH作为介词要对称（出现了两次），而FOR同样作为介词不需对称（只出现了一次）

再简言之：
She argues THAT the agency acts WITH reckless abandon AND WITH disregard for human life AND property....(RIGHT)

那么
She argues that the agency act with reckless abandon and disregard for human life and property....  是否正确？
再者
She argues that the agency act with reckless abandon and with disregard for human life and for property.... 是否正确？

lotuswarlock

sbyangyi

楼主你明白了么，我也有这个问题