issue 6求拍！谢谢

elfaro

6. A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Does the statement hold true that all the students should study the same natioanl curriculum until they enter college? It may seem appropriate that it is fair when it comes to the national selection of entering college. However, the statement impedes the secondary education development.

Under the same national curriculum, students across the nation are able to have more fair education or educational selection. For one thing, if the curriculum were the same, the assessment standard of their academic capacity would be more likely to be consistent across the nation. Then, they might have a more fair chance of getting into a college viewed from academic perspective. For another, the whole nation can share the same educational resources, e.g. teacher guidance on a certain course, exercises for students, which saves repeated labor and guarantee the education quality for all the students to a certain extent. Besides, based on the same curriculum, teachers from different areas of a nation are able to communicate their teaching methods more effectively, thus improve the teaching quiality as a whole.

However, this suggestion kills the flexibility of designing customized courses for each provinces. The flexibility and adaptability to the local culture, geography and history, however, is very necessary. First of all, the local culture and features, as a legacy, should be passed to the new generations such as students. Without the essential knowledge of one’s hometown, such education is next to a failure. It is very common that many students cannot, when asked about the specialties in which they come from, even point out one thing.

Besides, the local resources should be applied for better education, on which should place no limitation. For example, a city by the seaside should be encouraged to have courses like oceanology or a geography course with more emphasis on the sea and marine animals. By contrast, with the same curriculum as in inland provinces, the city can apply no local feature to educate their students, which is indeed a loss.

Moreover, the suggestion is not beneficial for the education revolution. Because of the same curriculum in the nation, it significantly discourages competition among provinces. With less competition, teachers and educators are more likely to settle down to where they are without thinking for further creativity in course designing and student encouragement and so on.

In designing curriculum for secondary school students, remaining a part of the same national curriculum contributes to resource sharing and reciprocal help. However, it is significant that there should be some free space for local schools to design their own courses for better education development.

提纲主干：
1.正：A.学生可以面对更加公平的大学选拔 B.老师可以更好地分享教学资源
2.反：A.扼杀了地区自主设计课程的可能性,带来后果有:a. 学生不能很好地传承当地的文化 b.当地可以被用在教学上的资源就这样被浪费了 B.阻碍了教育的改革

普渡哥

Does the statement hold true 。。

hold 后面应该是名词吧。

elfaro

普渡哥 有it holds true这种表达的……

It still holds true that man is most uniquely human when he turns obstacles into opportunities. - by Hoffer, Eric.

cancerlk

Does the statement hold true that all the students should study the same national curriculum until they enter college? It may seem appropriate that it is fair when it comes to the national selection of entering college. However, the statement impedes the secondary education development.

Under the same national curriculum, students across the nation are able to have more fair education or educational selection. For one thing, if the curriculum were the same, the assessment standard of their academic capacity would be more likely to be consistent across the nation. Then, they might have a more fair chance of getting into a college viewed from academic perspective. For another, the whole nation can share the same educational resources, e.g. teacher guidance on a certain course, exercises for students, which saves repeated labor and guarantee the education quality for all the students to a certain extent. Besides, based on the same curriculum, teachers from different areas of a nation are able to communicate their teaching methods more effectively, thus improve the teaching quality as a whole. (Why more effectively? U do better give some evidence and detail examples to show this)
Sum: Equality

However, this suggestion kills (compromises) the flexibility of designing customized courses for each provinces. The flexibility and adaptability to the local culture, geography and history, however, (this “however” seems redundant…) is very necessary. First of all, the local culture and features, as a legacy, should be passed to the new generations, namely, students.  such as students. Without the essential knowledge of one’s hometown, such education is next to a failure. It is very common that many students cannot, when asked about the specialties in which they come from, even point out one thing.
Sum: Local culture

Besides, the local resources should be applied for better education, on which should place no limitation (But, why? U should articulate this). For example, a city by the seaside should be encouraged to have courses like oceanology or a geography course with more emphasis on the sea and marine animals. By contrast, with the same curriculum as in inland provinces, the city can apply no local feature to educate their students, which is indeed a loss.
Sum: Local resource

Moreover, the suggestion is not beneficial for the education revolution. Because of the same curriculum in the nation, it significantly discourages competition among provinces (But still, why?). With less competition, teachers and educators are more likely to settle down to where they are without thinking for further creativity in course designing and student encouragement and so on.
Sum: Competition

In designing curriculum for secondary school students, remaining a part of the same national curriculum contributes to resource sharing and reciprocal help. However, it is significant that there should be some free space for local schools to design their own courses for better education development.


Comment: Yes, your opinions are great, especially the “local culture”. But you must analyze them more profoundly. That is, to give more reasons and to improve your deduction, otherwise it will not be a critical-analysis-writing but just simply putting your ideas together.


亲，互改一下吧：http://forum.chasedream.com/GRE_AW/thread-764718-1-1.html