求助36套exercise27第二篇。感觉2。3题答案不对。。。求大神讲解！

ran2010zx

Some recent historians have argued that life in the British colonies in America from approximately 1763 to 1789 was marked by internal conflicts among colonists. Inheritors of some of the viewpoints of early twentieth- century Progressive historians such as Beard and Becker, these recent historians have put forward arguments that deserve evaluation.  The kind of conflict most emphasized by these historians is class conflict. Yet with the Revolutionary War dominating these years, how does one distinguish class conflict within that larger conflict? Certainly not by the side a person supported. Although many of these historians have accepted the earlier assumption that Loyalists represented an upper class, new evidence indicates that Loyalists, like rebels, were drawn from all socioeconomic classes. (It is nonetheless probably true that a larger percentage of the well-to-do joined the Loyalists than joined the rebels.) Looking at the rebel side, we find little evidence for the contention that lower-class rebels were in conflict with upper-class rebels. Indeed, the war effort against Britain tended to suppress class conflicts. Where it did not, the disputing rebels of one or another class usually became Loyalists. Loyalism thus operated as a safety valve to remove socioeconomic discontent that existed among the rebels. Disputes occurred, of course, among those who remained on the rebel side, but the extraordinary social mobility of eighteenth-century American society (with the obvious exception of slaves) usually prevented such disputes from hardening along class lines. Social structure was in fact so fluid --- though recent statistics suggest a narrowing of economic opportunity as the latter half of the century progressed --- that to talk about social classes at all requires the use of loose economic categories such as rich, poor, and middle class, or eighteenth-century designations like "the better sort." Despite these vague categories, one should not claim unequivocally that hostility between recognizable classes cannot be legitimately observed. Outside of New York, however, there were very few instances of openly expressed class antagonism.     Having said this, however, one must add that there is much evidence to support the further claim of recent historians that sectional conflicts were common between 1763 and 1789. The "axton Boys" incident and the Regulator movement are representative examples of the widespread, and justified, discontent of western settlers against colonial or state governments dominated by eastern interests. Although undertones of class conflict existed beneath such hostility, the opposition was primarily geographical. Sectional conflict ---which also existed between North and South ---deserves further investigation.  In summary, historians must be careful about the kind of conflict they emphasize in eighteenth-century America. Yet those who stress the achievement of a general consensus among the colonists cannot fully understand that consensus without understanding the conflicts that had to be overcome or repressed in order to reach it.  (461 words



2.The author most likely refers to "historians such as  Beard and Becker" in the first paragraph in order to (A) isolate the two historians whose work is most  representative of the viewpoints of Progressive  historians
(B) emphasize the need to find connections between  recent historical writing and the work of  earlier historians
(C) make a case for the importance of the views  of the Progressive historians concerning  eighteenth-century American life
(D) suggest that Progressive historians were the first  to discover the particular internal conflicts in eighteenth-century American life mentioned  in the passage  
(E) point out historians whose views of history  anticipated some of the views of the recent historians mentioned in the passage  
3.According to the passage, Loyalism during  the American Revolutionary War served the  function of  
(A) eliminating the disputes that existed among  those colonists who supported the rebel cause
(B) drawing upper, as opposed to lower, socio- economic classes away from the rebel cause
(C) tolerating the kinds of socioeconomic discontent  that were not allowed to exist on the rebel side
(D) channeling conflict that existed within a socio- economic class into the war effort against the  rebel cause
(E) absorbing members of socioeconomic groups  on the rebel side who felt themselves in  contention with members of other socio- economic groups




我觉得两道题的答案都是A，不过答案说都是E。求解释 谢谢

ran2010zx

自己顶，求解答。。。