issue 42 学生质疑，拒绝被动接受----求交流.....

OliverZhou

提纲：1.质疑是必要的            对于科学领域来说，前人的理论总会有瑕疵，不可能是完美的，被动接受影响科学进步；            对于艺术领域来说，艺术就是要打破原有的艺术形式，以天马行空的想象进行创造

      2. 然而always质疑 却显得鲁莽
            老师由于经验更为丰富， 提出的许多建议会帮助学生避免backwater，故要尊重其意见，而不是总是抱着怀疑的眼光
            对于moral rules 的质疑，尤其在学生缺乏判断善恶能力的年轻时候，这种质疑反而会阻碍人格发展
            故要经过合理思考后再进行质疑


According to the statement , studentsshould always question what they are taught but not accept it passively. It istrue that question the knowledge being taught is essential for many fields, butit would be presumptuous to question  everything without careful thinking.
Being skeptic is necessary  especially for people who study science. Asthe theories brought up by predecessors are not always flawless, questioningthe validity and accuracy will certainly help them to find the defects andamend the theory. Consider, for example, the history  of optics is filled with questions andamendment. After the geometrical optics was brought up, scientists questionedits validity because it can not explain the phenomenon of optical interference.Then wave optics was brought up to solve this problem, however , it stillfailed to explain optical reactions with several materials. In the end , aftercountless researches and observations, scientists  created the quantum optics which explain thephotoelectric phenomenon perfectly.Without skepticism breakthroughs will certainlynot occur. It also apply to the artists , who always need unlimited imaginationto break the established forms and styles to make innovation. If they  accept what has been taught passively, therewill not be masterpieces about art.

However, it is presumptuous to alwaysquestion what are taught by their teachers. As teachers are always  more experienced than the students, theiradvices will undoubtedly be helpful for students as a guideline to avoid unnecessarybackwater. In fact, students should respect the opinions from their teachersbut not question them foolhardily. Besides, there are certain moral rules whichshould be obeyed since we were little when we lack the ability to identifybetween the evils and the goods. If we question these rules , it will only leadto the unsound development of our personal characters.
In sum, it is necessary to be skeptic withthe reliability and validity of what are taught, but questioning withoutcomprehensive thinking will only lead to undesirable results.

竹林中人

这篇文章只有３００字多一点，明显显得很单薄啊最好能分为三个段落，一个讲质疑的好处，一个讲过分质疑的坏处，最后一段讲质疑应当有什么样的标准或者依据，需要遵循什么样的原则等等。这样你的内容就很丰富了

OliverZhou

这篇文章只有３００字多一点，明显显得很单薄啊最好能分为三个段落，一个讲质疑的好处，一个讲过分质疑的坏处，最后一段讲质疑应当有什么样的标准或者依据，需要遵循什么样的原则等等。这样你的内容就很丰富了

-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/8/22 12:40:10)

嗯 ，再对什么是合理质疑进行下定义会显得丰满些.不过有个问题就是30分钟内我还写不了那么多，一方面是打字速度的限制，一方面是段落间的起承转合做的太差，写的时候总是短路；只有 最后一个多礼拜了。。。有点慌....