- UID
- 705524
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-12-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Professor That would be Stratigraphy. Stratigraphy isused for dating portable art. When archaeologists are digging at a site, theymake very careful notes about which stratum, which layer of earth theyfind things in. And, you know, the general rule is that the oldest layers are at thelowest level. But this only works if thesite hasn’t been touched, and the layers areintact. A problem with this dating method is that an object could have been carriedaround, used for several generations before it was discarded.So it might be much olderthan the layer or even the site where it was found. (这两句啥意思?被用了很久,所以年代显得更久些???)The stratification technique gives us the minimum age of an object,which isn’t necessarily its true age.(求翻译)Tom, inyour archaeology class, did you talk about radiocarbon dating? Tom Yeah, we did. That had to do with chemicalanalysis, something to do with measuring the amount of radiocarbon that’s left inorganic stuff. Because we know how fast radiocarbon decays, we can figure out theage of the organic material. Professor The key word there is organic. Is art madeof organic material? Tom Well, you said the lady with the hood wascarved out of ivory. That’s organic. Professor Absolutely. Any other examples? Amy Well, when they did those cavedrawings. Didn’t they use, like chacoalor maybe colors, dyes made from plants? Professor Fortunately, they did, at least some of thetime. So it turns out that radiocarbon dating works for a lot of prehistoric art.(“证明了同位素标记法对确定很多事前艺术品的日期有用?(是这样翻译的么?) ”这句和上文那个学生的问题有什么关系??教授没有对学生问题做任何解释呀) But again there’s a problem. This technique destroys what it analyzes, so you haveto chip off bits of the object for testing. Obviously we are reluctant to do that insome cases. And apart from that, there’s another problems. The date tells you theage of the material, say, a bone or a tree, the object is made from, but not the datewhen the artist actually created it. So, with radiocarbon dating, we get the maximumpossible age for the object, but it could be younger. Ok, let’ s say our scientific analysis hasproduced an age range. Can we narrow it down? Amy Could we look for similar styles ormotives? You know, try to find thingscommon to one time period. Professor We do that all the time. And when we see similarities in pieces ofart, we assume some connection in time or place. But is it possible that we could be imposingour own values on that analysis? Tom I am sorry. I don’t get your point. Professor Well, we have all kinds of pre-conceivedideas about how artistic styles develop. For example, a lot of people think the presenceof details demonstrates that the work was done by a more sophisticated artist.While a lack of detail suggests a primitive style. But trends in art in the lastcentury or so certainly challenge that idea. (这句话的意思是反驳前面“越精细越现代”的观点吧?) Don’t get me wrong though, analyzing the stylesof prehistoric art can help dating them. But we need to be careful with the ideathat artistic development occurs in a straight line, from simple to complexrepresentations. Amy(student) What you are saying is, I mean, I get thefeeling that this is like a legal process, like building a legal case, the more pieces ofevidence we have, the closer we get to the truth. ( 学生的观点是 要建立一个合法的,有据可依的系统来找到真相,这样理解对么?)
Professor Great analogy. And now you can see why we don’t have an exact date for our sculpture, the lady with the hood. |
|