ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2140|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

几道OG13 上的题目,纠结了好久好久,还是不太明白。。。向大家求教~~马上就要考试了,拜托拜托~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-12 10:58:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
有几道OG13 上的题目想想大家请教一下,主要是上面的解释有几题不太理解,自己苦思冥想好久了,还是要向大家求助啊~~

1. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain
and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain
grows and how babies acquire language.

(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

答案是A 没有问题,可是OG上对D的错误原因解释我看不懂,
1,大家都说是因为前后部分的时态不一致,可是不能把drawing 在这里看成是 neuroscientists 的修饰吗? 2,OG 上说drawing 看起来有可能是修饰 adulthood, 可是drawing 前面已经有逗号了啊,应该就是修饰neuroscientists了吧(我一直认为,如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语,不知道这样对不对…汗…)
3,还是说因为这里drawing表伴随,不合逻辑?我觉得这个解释比较能接受…

2. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

1, A 选项中的coordinating为什么有修饰歧义呢?这种情况下不能默认为修饰逻辑主语么?还是和上一题一样,我一直认为:如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语…大家别鄙视我…
2. E为什么不能看作coordinated 和 capitalized两个动词并列呢?

3. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult.
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would be deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.

答案是D 可是OG上说B选项the final phrase is awkwardly and ambiguously attached to the sentence, “or legally blind as an adult.”这个短语哪里模糊了啊?

4,再问一个问题,比如Lucy likes fruits, especially apples, which xxxxxxx.  这句话里的which 是修饰fruits 还是 apples呢? 还是看情况?

我自己纠结了好久啊,请大家帮忙解答一下~~谢谢各位牛牛了!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-12 17:04:20 | 只看该作者
有几道OG13 上的题目想想大家请教一下,主要是上面的解释有几题不太理解,自己苦思冥想好久了,还是要向大家求助啊~~

1. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain
and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain
grows and how babies acquire language.

(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

答案是A 没有问题,可是OG上对D的错误原因解释我看不懂,
1,大家都说是因为前后部分的时态不一致,可是不能把drawing 在这里看成是 neuroscientists 的修饰吗? 2,OG 上说drawing 看起来有可能是修饰 adulthood, 可是drawing 前面已经有逗号了啊,应该就是修饰neuroscientists了吧(我一直认为,如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语,不知道这样对不对…汗…)
3,还是说因为这里drawing表伴随,不合逻辑?我觉得这个解释比较能接受…

2. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

1, A 选项中的coordinating为什么有修饰歧义呢?这种情况下不能默认为修饰逻辑主语么?还是和上一题一样,我一直认为:如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语…大家别鄙视我…
2. E为什么不能看作coordinated 和 capitalized两个动词并列呢?

3. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult.
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would be deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.

答案是D 可是OG上说B选项the final phrase is awkwardly and ambiguously attached to the sentence, “or legally blind as an adult.”这个短语哪里模糊了啊?

4,再问一个问题,比如Lucy likes fruits, especially apples, which xxxxxxx.  这句话里的which 是修饰fruits 还是 apples呢? 还是看情况?

我自己纠结了好久啊,请大家帮忙解答一下~~谢谢各位牛牛了!
-- by 会员 雪の羽翼 (2012/8/12 10:58:00)



你给我留言了啊...问题4,句子没写完整,其实这样的non-essential modifier结构出来,倾向于xxxxxx指的是关于apples的描述了。假如你的xxxxxxx是在描述fruits,那句子就最好写成:
Lucy likes fruits -- especially apples -- which xxxxxxx.




问题1-3之前在版面讨论过了,请搜索。例如在google搜索框中输入:
"Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past" site:chasedream.com
另参见这个http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Preparation/thread-746392-1-1.html
如果看过之前的讨论仍有疑问再探讨。Good luck~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-13 11:38:47 | 只看该作者
有几道OG13 上的题目想想大家请教一下,主要是上面的解释有几题不太理解,自己苦思冥想好久了,还是要向大家求助啊~~

1. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain
and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain
grows and how babies acquire language.

(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

答案是A 没有问题,可是OG上对D的错误原因解释我看不懂,
1,大家都说是因为前后部分的时态不一致,可是不能把drawing 在这里看成是 neuroscientists 的修饰吗? 2,OG 上说drawing 看起来有可能是修饰 adulthood, 可是drawing 前面已经有逗号了啊,应该就是修饰neuroscientists了吧(我一直认为,如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语,不知道这样对不对…汗…)
3,还是说因为这里drawing表伴随,不合逻辑?我觉得这个解释比较能接受…

2. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and

1, A 选项中的coordinating为什么有修饰歧义呢?这种情况下不能默认为修饰逻辑主语么?还是和上一题一样,我一直认为:如果没有逗号就是就近修饰前一个名词,有逗号就是修饰逻辑主语…大家别鄙视我…
2. E为什么不能看作coordinated 和 capitalized两个动词并列呢?

3. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult.
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would be deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.

答案是D 可是OG上说B选项the final phrase is awkwardly and ambiguously attached to the sentence, “or legally blind as an adult.”这个短语哪里模糊了啊?

4,再问一个问题,比如Lucy likes fruits, especially apples, which xxxxxxx.  这句话里的which 是修饰fruits 还是 apples呢? 还是看情况?

我自己纠结了好久啊,请大家帮忙解答一下~~谢谢各位牛牛了!
-- by 会员 雪の羽翼 (2012/8/12 10:58:00)




你给我留言了啊...问题4,句子没写完整,其实这样的non-essential modifier结构出来,倾向于xxxxxx指的是关于apples的描述了。假如你的xxxxxxx是在描述fruits,那句子就最好写成:
Lucy likes fruits -- especially apples -- which xxxxxxx.




问题1-3之前在版面讨论过了,请搜索。例如在google搜索框中输入:
"Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past" site:chasedream.com
另参见这个http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Preparation/thread-746392-1-1.html
如果看过之前的讨论仍有疑问再探讨。Good luck~
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/8/12 17:04:20)



谢谢baby姐,我看了你的gmat日记里对Beatrix Potter这道题目的讨论,可是我还是不懂,A B选项的coordinating到底是错在哪里了?有歧义在哪里了?我觉得就是修饰的BP啊。。。
地板
发表于 2012-8-13 12:22:34 | 只看该作者
补充一下。

Lucy likes fruits, especially apples, which xxxxx。
上面这个句子中的which是无法跳过前面的modifier修饰fruits,这里只能修饰apples。babybearmm改不错~

LZ是手打的题目吧,第三题As a baby...,E选项多打了'be',在这里'be'比较关键,因为少了它deemed就用错了。
5#
发表于 2012-10-27 11:03:24 | 只看该作者
补充一下。

Lucy likes fruits, especially apples, which xxxxx。
上面这个句子中的which是无法跳过前面的modifier修饰fruits,这里只能修饰apples。babybearmm改不错~

LZ是手打的题目吧,第三题As a baby...,E选项多打了'be',在这里'be'比较关键,因为少了它deemed就用错了。
-- by 会员 keithyang926 (2012/8/13 12:22:34)

Lucy like fruits这个问题我觉得which应该可以修饰fruits吧?这是manhattan里面认可的啊?baby姐您说呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 03:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部