- UID
- 733546
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-3-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
速度 1.30 1.35 1.30 1.40 1.34
越障:4.10 two courts , one from sealltle , one from Kentucky. justice B wrote something , but it not advocate by many people , then he wrote another dissent , probably convince the plurality to protect minority students . this suggest is not about the doctri and methodology , the author can't wrote this case in a essay , instead , the author may wrote many cases like this in a essay and find out whether the dissegreations and education suits them , and why ? this quetion has been discussed for 20 years , the realtionship between normal students and minority students should be eaquality , this is advocate by the court ! as for integration , the debate about this will goes on
后来仔细看了一次, 虽然还是比较朦胧 the supreme court talks about the reduce desegregation in school , two schools give some plans , but none of them was advocated by courts . justice B wrote some consideration on this thing , Meanwhile , other justices like A B C D E focus on plurality and also worte some diseents about it . its aim is to protect minority students some will focus on doctince and methodology , some will not , the author can't wrote these things in a essay , instead , he will broden this case relate to the education and reform . and he most concern the question is important and why ? the answer is mixed , this has been discussed for 20 years , the racial integration might not important to achieve the goal , which is the equality between normal students and minority Ss . The main question is that whether the reform can evaluate the Ss' performance through the Test socres . Besides , whether it can cooperate good eventhogh they have different backgrouds . |
|