复习语法的最后一个晚上的最后一个问题= =， 请教NN们！！

SharonZ0902

up！还是不懂= =

树姑娘

up！我也不明白~

stlibai

如果明天就考试还是别钻牛角尖啦,gwd说sc就是考语意考语感滴.
是不是这道题加不加that都行的啊，就看选项有什么。
我做这道题就是排除法，前三字看到什么rather,yet,also全错，这样A,B,E就都挂了，然后仔细看了下C,没有as不平行，就只有D了，读了一遍还挺通顺的。
突然发现蒙的理智气壮地~
up一下期待正规解答吧~

Sabire

摘自国外论坛Generally two
indepedent clauses
are joined together
by using a
conjunction. Here
"that" is the
conjunction that
should be joining
these two ICs.
However, many a
times "that" is
dropped between
two ICs when the
meaning is
absolutely clearly.
For example:
She told me she
would call at 5 pm.
Joe mentioned the
party was at his
place.
Even if both these
sentences lack
"that", they are not
ambiguous in their
meaning.
Use of "that" is
imperative when it is
used as relative
pronoun.
For example:
Joe gave me a book
that was lying in his
room for six months
now.

jennychiu

paras123 wrote:

Ok the D Clears the parallelism issue but isn't the construction "households were confident they could safely" is a bit awkward without a "that " between confident and they??? ( "households were confident that they could safely....")


Hi there,
Your doubt is pretty valid. Generally two indepedent clauses are joined together by using a conjunction. Here "that" is the conjunction that should be joining these two ICs. However, many a times "that" is dropped between two ICs when the meaning is absolutely clearly.
For example:
She told me she would call at 5 pm.
Joe mentioned the party was at his place.

Even if both these sentences lack "that", they are not ambiguous in their meaning.

Use of "that" is imperative when it is used as relative pronoun.
For example:
Joe gave me a book that was lying in his room for six months now.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
另一个帖子Vivian1091发的，复制过来~