ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: atxatx
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG13 SC107,谢谢各位

  [复制链接]
51#
发表于 2016-11-26 10:56:24 | 只看该作者
jiaoguitar 发表于 2012-7-12 02:06
不用for的话原句变成cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, ...

同意!               
52#
发表于 2016-11-30 14:33:32 | 只看该作者
jiaoguitar 发表于 2012-7-12 02:06
不用for的话原句变成cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, ...

那怎么不用of 而用for?
53#
发表于 2016-11-30 14:42:14 | 只看该作者
barrymachine 发表于 2012-12-29 11:52
看了其他人的帖子我概括一下下:(A) While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other ty ...

好像懂了  是那么一回事~ 谢谢
54#
发表于 2017-5-19 10:39:25 | 只看该作者
这是我在GMAT Club上找到的,Instructor sayantanc2k回答的关于选项B中为什么用的For而不是Of的回答。供大家参考。
Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/while-it-costs-about-the-same-to-run-nuclear-plants-as-other-134755-60.html

Question: The cost of running A is the same as (the cost) FOR B, not of?
Instructor: Yes, you have a point. Ideally the construction should have been:

The cost of running A is the same as the cost of running B.
Parallel elements:
Cost of running A
Cost of running B.

However, the construction in option B is not grammatically wrong either:

The cost of running  A is the same as (the cost ) for B..(repeated part cost omitted)
Parallel elements:
Cost of running A
Cost for B

In both cases the comparison is between costs. It is not mandatory to maintain parallelism for what follows "cost", i.e. the rest of the two parallel elements.

Let me elaborate a bit more clearly. As long as the comparison is between cost and cost , the sentence is grammatically correct. If the prepositional modifiers of cost are different, then the sentence cannot be said wrong. Nonetheless using similar modifiers is preferred.

cost (of doing) & cost of (thing): NOT illogical.
Cost of eating dinner at XYZ restaurant (say INR 1000) is less than the cost of this bicycle (say INR 5000)..... alright.
55#
发表于 2017-7-22 18:27:42 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-16 17:23
我觉得barry说的很对,在此我来补充一下,如果有不对欢迎大家指正
——虽然前面zhima427的回 ...

同意!               
56#
发表于 2017-9-17 20:57:44 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-16 17:23
我觉得barry说的很对,在此我来补充一下,如果有不对欢迎大家指正
——虽然前面zhima427的回 ...

同意!               
57#
发表于 2017-10-4 21:20:05 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
58#
发表于 2017-10-21 15:06:24 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-16 17:23
我觉得barry说的很对,在此我来补充一下,如果有不对欢迎大家指正
——虽然前面zhima427的回 ...

同意!               
59#
发表于 2017-10-23 09:43:33 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-16 17:23
我觉得barry说的很对,在此我来补充一下,如果有不对欢迎大家指正
——虽然前面zhima427的回 ...

做的真的太好了,一语中的!
60#
发表于 2017-10-23 10:25:14 | 只看该作者
hemodata 发表于 2013-7-16 17:23
我觉得barry说的很对,在此我来补充一下,如果有不对欢迎大家指正
——虽然前面zhima427的回 ...

不能把B选项看成the cost (of running n-plants) is about the same as  (for running) other types of power plants吗?
总觉得the cost of running n-plants is about the same as (the running costs) for other types ofpower plants没有平行呀?cost of 和 the running cost 不算平行了呀?前面的running 和后面的for 都没有平行对象呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 03:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部