陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3.3求翻译求解答！！

ShAlexron

Juries in criminal trials do not base verdict on uncorroborated testimony given by any one witness. rightly so, because it is usually prudent to be highly skeptical of unsubstantiated claims made by any one person. but then, to be consistent, juries should end an all-to-common practice: convicting defendants on the basis of an uncorroborated full confession.

逻辑support题，以下哪个strengthen.
我选的c: defendants sometimes make full confession when they did in fact do what they are accused of doing and have come to believe that the prosecutor has compelling proof of this
答案是d: highly suggestible people who are accused of wrongdoing sometimes become so unsure of their own recollection of the past that they can come to accept the accusations made against them.

求解释啊！！！！尤其是求翻译！！！文章完全没看懂。。

ShAlexron

依旧在等高人。。自己顶一下~

xpyin

不是高人，试着解释下哈：
Juries in criminal trials do not base verdict on uncorroborated testimony given by any one witness. rightly so, because it is usually prudent to be highly skeptical of unsubstantiated claims made by any one person. but then, to be consistent, juries should end an all-to-common practice: convicting defendants on the basis of an uncorroborated full confession
翻译是：陪审团不会基于对任何证人的未经证实的证词进行裁定，这么做是很正确的因为通常来说对于人和人未经证实的证词保持高度怀疑是很明智的。但是，为了保持一致性，陪审团也应该终止这样惯例的行为，即基于被告未经证实的全部坦白而给被告定罪。
问题是问加强。
再看选项：

(A) Juries often acquit in cases in which a defendant retracts a full confession made before trial.
陪审团通常在这样的案子中认为无罪，即被告在宣判之前收回之前彻底的坦白。
无关吧
(B) The process of jury selection is designed to screen out people who have a firm opinion about the defendant's guilt in advance of the trial.

陪审团选择的过程被设计为在排除掉那些在审判之前就对被告有罪有很肯定的观点的人
也无关吧
(C) Defendants sometimes make full confessions when they did in fact do what they are accused of doing and have come to believe that the prosecutor has compelling proof of this.当被告确实做了他们被指控的罪行并且他们认为控方有足够令人信服的证据时，他们通常会做彻底的坦白。
无关吧


(D) Highly suggestible people who are accused of wrongdoing sometimes become so unsure of their own recollection of the past that they can come to accept the accusations made against them.
非常容易受影响的那些人，当被指控做错事时有时不能够确定他们自己过去的回忆，所以他们接受对他们的指控

(E) Many people believe that juries should not convict defendants who have not made a full confession.
许多人认为陪审团不应该认定被告有罪，如果被告没有彻底坦白。
无关

文章的结论是：陪审团也应该终止被告坦白就宣判的行为。
只有D是支持了这一结论，表明这一宣判是站不住脚的。

这个逻辑确实有点绕。