ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A new hair-growing drug is being sold for three times the price, per milligram, as the drug's maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 18415|回复: 42
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 4-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-10 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 4-4

Q4:


A new hair-growing drug is being sold for three times the price, per milligram, as the drug’s maker charges for another product with the same active ingredient.




  • as

  • than

  • that

  • of what

  • at which

  • 看了以前的讨论,在A、C、D、E之间还是没能选出一个答案,请指教

    沙发
    发表于 2004-10-10 10:17:00 | 只看该作者
    个人现在还是倾向于C,  charge price还是很常见的,原来答案D,还未看到令人信服的依据。
    板凳
    发表于 2005-1-23 14:56:00 | 只看该作者

    D

    Maybe we might understand in the way:  

    three times the price of what the drug’s maker charges....

    In this sentence, the main frame is  xx times + noun+ of... ; what is equal to the price that....

    Thank you

    地板
    发表于 2005-1-24 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

    up

    5#
    发表于 2005-4-8 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

    I am with the answer: C (that).


    got one example from google: "hundreds of thousands of these Americans could have paid their medical bills if they were not (literally) three times the price that the same hospitals charge their insured patients. "


    "three times the price of what ... charges for ..." sounds awkward. if this usage is right, what does "what" stand for?

    6#
    发表于 2005-4-24 15:54:00 | 只看该作者

    同意C.

    that 引导的是同位语从句, 后面的从句用来解释price。

    D: 如果what 指代price,则出现price of price。但price of sth.中的sth需要是另一个对象,如price of the watch手表的价格。

    E: at which 中的at似乎不妥。如果看作定语从句的话,变成charge for sth. at (price)。应该是charge (price) for sth. 如the maker charges 30RMB for the drug.

    7#
    发表于 2005-5-5 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

    what=the thing that, D中的what为什么不可以理解成the drug that, 这里的that是drug的关系代词, 而且存在charge for sth的说法?

    8#
    发表于 2005-5-5 19:58:00 | 只看该作者
    斑竹啊,的确按你所讲the thing that很说得通,但是[the thing]不要只用that就够了,也就是说without the thing the meaning of this sentence has not been impeded or without any loss in meaning(这种解释og上蛮常见的吧)。你说呢?当然,逻辑与结构上D都是没有错的,应该是比concise吧。
    9#
    发表于 2005-6-9 01:52:00 | 只看该作者
    what为什么不可以理解为the price that , 这样D不就能解释通了吗??
    10#
    发表于 2005-6-20 09:02:00 | 只看该作者

    I'm in preference of D (of what).


    When putting "that" in the sentence, it doesn't sound right when speaking the sentence out. And right after the comma, is it ok to put "that" at such a place?


    I think "three times the price (get rid of the middle part) of what the drug maker charges for another pill...", then the "what" brings out the remaining of the sentence pretty smoothly.


    No significant evidence to proof why it's right, but it does sound much better than "that" in my opinion.

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 21:41
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部