我已经被这些有的没的的语法给弄晕了,SC 错误答案的通病就是冗杂,冗杂很容易带来指代不清的问题,毕竟正常人谁会那样讲话。按正常逻辑,开头是digging,谁能digging,只能是人,A,B排除。C,D,E看,明显C更简洁。D,E有什么问题,谁能给我解释一下-than that which was & than that 是什么??? from XDF D【错误1】 句子意思:“evidence”暗示的内容应是“复杂生命形式出现的比之前认为的更早”,而不是“emergence”本身,因此(D)表意逊于(C)使用“complex life-forms emerged much earlier than previously thought”。【错误2】 固定搭配:不存在用“which”引导的定语从句修饰代词“that”的用法。E同理。
我个人理解是省略了
还原
(C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than (complex life-forms) previously thought (emerged)
句子与句子的比较,可以省略主语和谓语