There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
- There
are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
- There
are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished. - There
are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
- Unlike
cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished. - Unlike
catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
i think A is a better answer than C. monkfish/cod/haddock can be either singulr or plural without changing forms, so the "their" is not a concern.
in C, the "which" really looks suspicious, according to GMAT rules.
-----------------------------------------
The electronics company has unveiled what it claims to be the world’s smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, and it weighs less than 11 ounces.
- to be the world’s smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, and it weighs
- to be the smallest network digital camcorder in the world, which is as long as a handheld computer, weighing
- is the smallest network digital camcorder in the world, which is as long as a handheld computer, and it weighs
- is the world’s smallest network digital camcorder, which is as long as a handheld computer and weighs
- is the world’s smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, weighing
prefer D than the rest.
-"has unveiled what it claims is" is not rare on newspapers - "which is... and weighs..." is a perfect parellelism
in B, besides arguable position of "which is", "weighing..."'s placement looks awkward too.
Open to discussion though.
|