首先,我绝对否认你说OG12 #75是"这里变成了语法优先于逻辑"
By definition, if you want to claim "这里变成了语法优先于逻辑", you have to prove that the logic is sacrificed in the correct choice. i.e. you have to prove that the correct choice has worse logic but better grammar, which leads the choice to win.
Really? I fact, the correct choice has both optimal grammar and logic.
Regarding the pronoun ambiguity issue, one choice is "their" the other choice is "the animals'" then, obviously, the latter is better in clarity.
baby姐我觉得这道题涉及到一个问题:究竟是逻辑优先于语法,还是语法优先于逻辑 从逻辑上来说,their指代clones是完全错误的。 从纯语法角度上来说their指代clones和members都是可以的,对吧? 所以这道题是逻辑优先于语法那么在排题的时候,究竟是逻辑优先于语法,还是语法优先于逻辑? 再看这道题: 75. A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed. (A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are OG的解释是A答案their指代歧义(因为their在语法上可能指代visitors、parks和犀牛) 而从逻辑角度上讲,their显然是不能指代visitors的(人类和parks显然不能长角,作者的逻辑意思显然不是这个) 这里变成了语法优先于逻辑?-- by 会员 qiaowin88637 (2012/6/14 11:35:56)
|