- UID
- 770917
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-6-17
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我觉得这里有个逻辑问题,就是前提是是否所有人都是想去做那些super competitive funds 如果是真的按照这样的逻辑的话, 沃顿应该是强于哈佛的毕竟沃顿去做这些FUNDS的人要多的多 可惜我们公司的沃顿出来的都是申请哈佛没申上的,中国人也好,美国人也好,都不会认为沃顿排哈佛之前
ANYWAY, MBA就像找对象一样,合适是最好,不用一定要分出个RANKING你第一我第一的,太无聊了
One of the reasons for WHY LBS, From GC If you want to get a feel for the difference between INSEAD and LBS, you have to look at areas that are super competitive even for top MBA grads (not typical recruiters such as MC/ IB), such as PE funds or HFs. Have a look e.g. at big buyout funds (almost all have employee profiles online), and you will see that only one of the two schools above is on par with very few US schools in that field... |
|