我同意serena jj关于这道题的意见。但是至于引用的chengzi1的那3条总结,抱歉我不认同。
"如果B是单数(不管A是单数还是复数),which后面动词也是单数,没有歧义,which修饰B。" ---chengzi1 好吧,咱一起来看OG12 #110,是个全划线句子
Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of the Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader.
(A) Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of the Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader.
(B) Published in Harlem, two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, were the owner and editor of the Messenger.
(C) Published in Harlem, the Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, and Chandler Owen.
(D) The Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, and published in Harlem.
(E) The owner and editor being two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, the Messenger was published in Harlem.
正确句子如下:
(C) Published in Harlem, the Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, and Chandler Owen.
同学你是否曾这么想:“GMAT真BT,整个那么长的插入语(, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader,),故意刁难我们考生让我们需要去掉它才能看清主干....”
同学你是否想过,为啥句子不这么写(把这两个人的先后顺序对调一下): (F) Published in Harlem, the Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader.
还有,请注意OG这道题解释部分的第一段的最后一句话,说的是A选项的"Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader"存在逻辑问题。这可不是空穴来风,是精华中的精华! It is also unclear which of the two journalists is described in the clause beginning who.
来看看这里吧: http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/04/13/split-the-pair-in-sentence-correction
剩下的思考空间留给大家。
不考虑后面的逻辑含义,但从语法层面来看的话我个人觉得they这样指代是没有错误的。 从以前的答疑帖里看到了以下这样的解释,虽然不是特别特别合适,但是还是贴过来给LZ看一看 ------------------------------------------------------------我是分割线------------------------------------------------------------- “还有,如果你非要纠结于这个A+B,代词用单复数的问题,我前天看过一位童鞋的总结挺有道理的, 拿which为例, A+B,which V.这种pattern, 如果A和B都是单数,which后面动词复数,没有歧义,which修饰A and B。 如果B是单数(不管A是单数还是复数),which后面动词也是单数,没有歧义,which修饰B。 如果B是复数(不管A是单数还是复数)则必须要用which together,没有歧义,这时which修饰A and Bs。 记得哦。。。要加together,不过我觉得加both也是同样的道理吧,” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------以上来自chengzi1的解释 还是希望baby姐来给个更有力的解释 -- by 会员 Serena0710 (2012/5/26 21:05:47)
|