as well as后面能否接动词原形，与前面的动词原形平行？？？

never1226

Mark一下！               

iamtwo

上邪 发表于 2012-5-12 21:19
普通平行：名词动词形容词副词一切可平行之物1.     The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Da ...

awesome!!! thanks a lot!!!

lxn1234

Mark一下！               

neal33

有用！

芒果脑壳

mark！

猴赛雷的Annie

我有个问题，以前的老贴有分析”主句，while doing”的结构，前辈指出其中的while是从属连词，可以类似于引导词，这里的as well as是不是也是一个意思啊？

雪梨一次过

上邪 发表于 2012-5-12 21:19
普通平行：名词动词形容词副词一切可平行之物1.     The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Da ...

Mark一下！               

啊喂我是蚊子

帖子中另一个例题的解释：

Examples of "tulipomania," a term coined from the tulip craze of the seventeenth-century in the Netherlands, include speculative bubbles in South Seas trading rights in the 1720s, Victorian real estate in the 1880s, the U.S. stock market in the 1920s, and the obsession for Beanie Babies in the 1990s.

The tree highlights (or would highlight) a problem with parallelism in the list of four items that are examples of speculative bubbles. According to the sentence, there were speculative bubbles in trading rights, real estate, a stock market and an obsession. The first three represent the items upon which the speculative bubble was built; the fourth does not.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) CORRECT. This choice corrects the parallelism error by removing the fourth item, the obsession, from the list of things that were speculative bubbles. Now, the sentence says that "examples... include speculative bubbles" in trading rights, real estate and the stock market and "[examples... include] the obsession for Beanie Babies." It is not necessary to repeat the words "examples include" in the second part of the sentence.

(C) While this choice corrects the parallelism error by removing the fourth item, the obsession, from the list of things that were speculative bubbles, it introduces a modifier error. The initial phrase "coined from..." is followed by the noun "examples." However, the term "tulipomania" was coined from the tulip craze; the examples were not coined from the craze.

(D) This choice does not correct the original parallelism error. According to the sentence, there were speculative bubbles in trading rights, real estate, a stock market and an obsession. The first three represent the items upon which the speculative bubble was built; the fourth does not.

(E) This choice does not correct the original parallelism error. According to the sentence, there were speculative bubbles in trading rights, real estate, a stock market and an obsession. The first three represent the items upon which the speculative bubble was built; the fourth does not. In addition,the sentence introduces confusion because it implies that the later examples of speculative bubbles were "included" in, or a part of, the original tulipomania.

Akiii

babybearmm 发表于 2012-5-12 18:30
as well as后面能否接动词原形，与前面的动词原形平行？？？请注意你给的那个正确的例句，是两层平行结构1. ...

不太同意如果是平行就要用and。如果用as well as emit我觉得没问题。B主要错在HAVING DONE做修饰。
ron说过  comma+having done 只有这种形式是可以的。
没有comma直接后置修饰是不行的。