- UID
- 422655
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-2-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发
楼主 |
发表于 2012-5-11 09:43:35
|
只看该作者
看到这段话,我又激动了。
Sometimes, the best way to deal with a pronoun problem is to eliminate pronouns, as we have seen. For instance, at the end of a long sentence, a pronoun such as it or them might inevitably have ambiguous antecedents, no matter how you try to recast the sentence.
Wrong: After roasting the deer, the hunter extinguished the fire and then searched for a tree to hang IT from.
From the sense of the words, we know that the hunter intends to hang the deer, not the fire. But it could in theory refer to the fire, so we have a classic case of antecedent ambiguity that we must fix.
Repeating the antecedent noun is always an option, if not necessarily the most elegant.
Right: After roasting the deer, the hunter extinguished the fire and then searched for a tree to hang THE DEER from.
It is often smoother-and much more GMAT-like-to use a generic synonym for the antecedent than to repeat the noun exactly. Such a synonym stands in for the antecedent and functions just like a pronoun, but with none of the drawbacks. The synonym is often more general than the antecedent, which refers to an example of the generic synonym.
看来GMAT很喜欢用generic synonym 下面这SC题的正确句子。
In 1981 children in the Unted States spend slightly less than 2.5 hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 THAT FIGURE had grown to nearly 6 hours a week.
That figure 就是slightly less than 2.5 hours a week的generic synonym.
|
|