For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously in that a single tree, depending on both its size and on climate and altitude, could produce enough berries to make between one and twelve pounds of dried beans a year. (A) enormously in that a single tree, depending on both its size and on climate and altitude, could produce (B) enormously in that a single tree, dependent on its size and also on climate and altitude, is able to produce (C) enormously, because a single tree, depending on its size and on climate and altitude, is able to produce (D) enormously, because a single tree, being dependent on its size, climate, and altitude, is capable of producing (E) enormously, because a single tree, dependent both on its size as well as on climate and altitude, could produce
关于夹心修饰 (by aeoluseros): 所以歧义修饰,是因为引发了不同的理解,而并不是语法上是否会有不同的修饰,所谓夹心修饰也是这 个原则。很多人对“夹心修饰”都有过一个误解,认为S, v-ing, V. + O.结构中,v-ing既可以往前修饰S, 也可以往后修饰V就是夹心,而实际上夹心并不是“可以往前修饰S,也可以往后修饰V” 。在S, v-ing, V. + O.这样的表达中,v-ing约定俗成只伴随修饰动词,见下例: prep 2-104 The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously, because a single tree, depending on its size and on climate and altitude, is able to produce enough berries to make between one and twelve pounds of dried beans a year. 这个句子里depending不能改为dependent,因为depending和dependent的区别在于,前者伴随修饰谓 语动词is able to produce,后者则是修饰名词single tree,会造成逻辑上不对—— “一棵树依靠它的size”。
prep07里说depending作为伴随状语和dependent作为形容词插入语都是合理的用法。
我有点不懂prep08的解释,depending伴随修饰谓语动词is able to produce, 那么它的逻辑主语不还是single tree么,不还是有这个意思“一棵树依靠它的size”。而且我觉得这样的逻辑意思也没什么问题,Depending on it's size, the tree.....逻辑有什么问题?
例:OG10-39For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
A.a method to protect
B.as a method protecting
C.protecting
D.as a protection of
E.to protect
OG10-39的解释(注意C选项的解释):
Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did. Choices A and B awkwardly use the singular word method to refer to items of military equipment rather than to the use of such items. Also, a method of protecting would be more idiomatic than a method to protect in A or a method protecting in B. In B and D, as is incorrect; also, a protection in D has no noun for which it can logically substitute. Choice E is incomplete; used to protect would have been acceptable.
OG11-24的解释(注意C和E选项的解释)
Logical predication + rhetorical construction
The underlined part of the sentence begins a phrase describing items of military equipment. It is awkward and inaccurate to describe items as a method. Replacing the underlined phrase with the participle protecting creates a modifying phrase that clearly explains the purpose of the items of military equipment.
AA method to protect is an awkward reference to items
BThe singular a method should not refer to the plural items, as a method protecting is not idiomatic
CCorrect. In this sentence, protecting properly introduces a modifying phrase revealing the purpose of the items.
DBeginning the phrase with as is incorrect; using the noun form protection creates wordiness
EThe infinitive to protect cannot act as an adjective modifying items; the participial form of the verb, protecting, is required