gwd 7-1

hanson_luo

Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be a resurgence of inflation.

factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be

factors and not necessarily that it foreshadowed

factors and did not necessarily foreshadow

factors, while not necessarily a foreshadowing of

factors, while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be

答案是C，E错在那儿呢？

kingsoft

       1。罗嗦

       2。划线部分的内容也是分析家说的话，用while将两部分割裂开来，破坏句子

      

hanson_luo

我感觉主要是因为while引导的后面部分没有对比的意味，用while牵强

wojianiu

Seems C is the best answer,--no else is better...

But do you think there is mistake in the sentence: The analyst said that the increase WAS resulted from...(there is no WAS in the sentence...)

ethyl

A：and前后谓语动词不平行；foreshadow用法awkward

B：and前后结构不平行

C：Concise and parallel, choice C is the best answer.

D：把and换成whlie,平添比较意思；a foreshadowing of用法awkward

E：同C；foreshadow从句不简洁

michellechang

LZM说there be必须后面跟具体名词，而inflation是抽象名词，排除AE先

我觉得这条公理满好用的

happysandy

这题的e答案有没有主从关系不明确之嫌？

（Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors,） while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be a resurgence of inflation.

不知道二楼的NN的第二条是否也有这个意思？做题是就是觉得e罗嗦，现在分析下来感觉好像这里也有点问题，希望大家指正

advantage

选了c之后返回来想b,觉得也有可能是said that...and that...并列呢,不知道这样想问题在哪里,是因为那个not necessary,我觉得是改变句子愿意,但是想知道语法上有没有错误...

zhoujian

以下是引用wojianiu在2005-3-23 6:40:00的发言：

Seems C is the best answer,--no else is better...

But do you think there is mistake in the sentence: The analyst said that the increase WAS resulted from...(there is no WAS in the sentence...)

WAS is not needed here.

result from itself is a intransitive verb

So we can say His illness resulted from bad food.

Therefore, the usage of result here is correct.

wzparete

E，there would be a resurgence of inflation,抽象名词，错。