ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: feathsea8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于VING的修饰作用的总结帖~基于babybearmm,suri 在奋斗和zhongshanlh等前辈的讨论帖

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-12 16:14:37 | 只看该作者
谢谢BABY姐~~
12#
发表于 2012-4-22 23:44:06 | 只看该作者
还有个问题要求助BABY姐~~~OG 12 87 In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vinThers have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell, and they are.(A) have been priced to sell, and they are
(B) are priced to sell, and they have
(C) are priced to sell, and they do(CORRECT)
(D) are being priced to sell, and have
(E) had been priced to sell, and they have

C的解释是,Correct. This sentence properly uses they do
in place of they do sell, a grammatically
correct verb.


1do/did+动词原型表强调的时候,动词原形是可以省略的么?以及,这里的do难道不是像manhattam 里面写的 use helping verbs to stand for longer verbs or verb phrases.也就是不省略的话应该是their wines are priced to sell, and they sell. 么?
2 还有就是以manhattam里面的例子来看:
I have never seen an aardvark, but my father has. 省略的部分补出是my father has seen an aardvark,也就是与前面一个主句的动宾一致,但是本题补出是,their wines are priced to sell, and they do sell. 省略的部分sell并不是前一句的动宾啊。。。Manhattam 的里面倒是也有一句our cars were designed to inspire inspire envy, and they do.但是我还是没法理解省略的部分应该是前面的哪一部分,有什么规律呢?还是只要出现过the exact verb form就可以省略啊。。。。
还望BABY姐解答~~~~
-- by 会员 feathsea8 (2012/4/10 16:46:33)





好问题,老实说我还真不知道怎么从语法角度解释。(呼唤nn)
不过呢,我就用Ron的方法:
you may find that your best course of action is simply to commit the acceptable versions to memory, and then look for sentences that look like them.
that's the entire way we learn language as kids - imitate the "proper" speech of adults - so it may be the best way to go here, too.  unless you have a ridiculous memory, it's probably not worthwhile to try to memorize all the "rules" governing subtleties such as this one.

咱先来体会一下这两个句子:
Their wines are priced to sell, and they do.
[The vintners' wines are priced to sell, and the vintners do sell.]    
读的时候重读蓝色部分,强调前面的不定式(通常表示intention的含义),再强调后面的do(表示fact),体现出类“如愿以偿”的感觉。发现了吗——强调的部分,也正好是平行结构!

下面这个句子你找得真好,感谢!
Our cars were designed to inspire envy, and they do.
[Our cars were designed to inspire envy, and our cars do inspire envy. ]

那我试着imitate,造几个句子:
The flying machine by the Wright Brothers was designed to fly, and it did.
Apple is missioned to challenge the status quo, and it does.
The Nazi was destined to fall, and it did.
The stock market had been predicted to soar following the release of the March data, and it did.
The crack-down of the commenting functions on Sina's and Tencent's microblogs was intended to quell the Internet spreading of political rumors, and it did.   (不讨论事实是否如此哈,我只是造个句子
......
好啦,你也可以brain-storm,造句子。然后考试时遇到类似的句子就可以apply our pattern recognition,这就足够了。
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/4/11 2:29:11)


baby姐姐,我今天刚好看到这题,发现这道题其实和og 85 有相似点。
以下摘自 Ron:
if you have a parallel construction involving tensed verbs, and the tensed verb is EXACTLY THE SAME in both (or all, if there are more than 2) parts of the construction, then you may omit the verb in all but the first part.
for instance:
the rain was torrential and the wind fierce.
in this case, we're allowed to omit the second 'was', because it's identical to the 'was' in the first part.

而这道题呢就是一个逆过程,它已经做了省略→动词补充出来就必须 exactly the same.
不知道这样理解对不对。
还有一点想要请教baby姐姐的是这里面的代词指代问题,曾经想过,也不知道自己想的对不对:
这句话我们可不可以这么来看,and 暗示一种平行结构。
their wines are priced to sell, and they do sell.M上讲说当代词出现在一个平行结构当中时,第二个句子中的代词趋于指代和第一个句子中地位相同的对象,特别是主语的情况。
在这里是符合的。
they
指的是 their wines,并且前面有分号,这个句子相对独立,they 如果指酒商是不合理的,因为代词指代不能 touch inside.

请baby姐姐拍砖~~thx~~

13#
发表于 2012-4-23 04:35:52 | 只看该作者
sounds a decent analysis.
well done~ thanks for sharing, annie
14#
发表于 2012-4-23 07:52:58 | 只看该作者
sounds a decent analysis.
well done~ thanks for sharing, annie
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/4/23 4:35:52)


谢谢baby姐姐,回复总那么及时,要多注意休息,总觉得你好辛苦~有点心疼...
15#
发表于 2012-5-16 12:42:14 | 只看该作者
感谢感谢感谢~~~
16#
发表于 2012-7-23 13:16:55 | 只看该作者
哇!总结的好棒!

但有一个问题问一下啦~
Born Charles Hardin Holley, Buddy Holly recorded some of the most distinctive and influential songs in rock-and –roll music, which includes such classics as “That’ll ne the day”,” Rave on.” and “Peggy Sue.”
which includes是划线部分,逗号没有划线,
正确答案:including
但是我觉得这里including不符合那两个要求啊,既不是同时发生的,又不是一种结果?
说which includes错误的原因是时态,应该用过去时,但是这种作品类的不应该是现在时吗?

求解啦。谢谢~~
17#
发表于 2012-7-27 20:08:54 | 只看该作者
thanks~~~~~~~~~~~~
18#
发表于 2012-8-8 18:40:56 | 只看该作者
看看~
19#
发表于 2012-8-8 18:55:34 | 只看该作者
谢谢!!辛苦啦!!!
20#
发表于 2012-10-8 20:43:02 | 只看该作者
我下载了,辛苦了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 20:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部