agrument 1 的提纲~~求指教

xuanxuanxue

A1
Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistorical village of Palean and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archeologists discovered such a Palean basket in Lithos , an ancient village across the Brim River from Palean.The Brim River is very deep and board, and so the ancient Palean could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

A1conclusion: the so-called Palean baskets were not unique Palean
                   woven baskets characterizd by a particular distinctive pattern previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people


     point 1: recently, archaeologists discovered such a Palean basket in Lithods，an ancient village    across the Brim River from Palean, which is very deep and broad.


     point 2: the ancient Palean could have crossed it only by boat, and no boats have been found.


主要的逻辑错误
1 以偏概全 虽然只在Palean附近发现的怎么就能得出结论是那独有的，1）因为技术的不成熟，还没有发现其他地方同样的物品，2）其他地方的物品由于某些不可抗拒原因（自然灾害、战争）消失了，3）人为的迁移，也许是制造这个物品的民族由于什么原因迁移到这个地方，然后遗留下来
前提就是错误的


2 而且已证明此前提是错误的情况下，近期科学家在lithods的发现证实了此物品并非是palean的，但是证据仍然不足。首先，发现的这个只是离Palean一条河的小镇，也算是这个村子的附近。


3 而且证据2以河的宽及深说明古Palean由于没有可渡河的工具（没有发现）因此不可能将物品运输到对岸，所以它有可能是那边人制造的，所以不会是palean人独有制造。但是事物不是永恒不变的，数年前，也许不存在这条河，两边村子人是可以没有地域的限制进行交易（交易物品），Palean人把它们自己独有制造的篮子因某种货品卖给l的人，或是那边的人很喜爱这种在p特有的篮子，在P时买并带回去收藏等。因此也就在l流传下来。所以在l发现并不稀奇。


总结：该A证据不足，无法准确说明这个编织篮是不是P独有，因为就目前所掌握的证据都不足够说明两种任何一种观点，需要更加详细确信的论据支持。

普渡哥

提纲很好，建议用英文写出来。作文还是要练练。

xuanxuanxue

谢谢建议~~~恩好的~