ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4858|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

princeton review manual的两道tricky questions

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-20 04:57:00 | 只看该作者

princeton review manual的两道tricky questions



Q 1


Now even directors of off-Broadway productions, desperate for actors who are talented, charistmatic, and aspiring more to a solid career in the theater than to the lucrative rewards and stardom proffered by movie moguls and studios, are turning to independent casting directors for guidance in assembling their casts.


A are talented, charistmatic, and aspiring


B  are talented, who have charistma, and who are aspiring


C have talented are charistmatic, and aspire


D are talented and have charistma, and whose aspirations are


E are talented, charistmatic, and who aspire


毫不犹豫的选了A,一看答案是E


Q 2


Scientists now suspect that imperial mammonths of the Pleistocene period were wiped out not by human predation, as were mammoths of earlier periods, but by a sudden and extreme change in climate.


A  as were mammoths of earlier periods


B like that in an ealier period


C as in ealier periods


D as were earlier periods


E like the mammoths in an earlier period


偶选C,但是A是正确答案。 Tricky, tricky...


题目来源princetonreview  GMAT manual


沙发
发表于 2004-9-20 07:43:00 | 只看该作者

I agree that Q2 should be A.

However, I don't think E in Q1 is right. Maybe E should be "are talented and charistmatic, and who aspire" rather than "are talented, charistmatic, and who aspire"?

板凳
发表于 2004-9-20 09:28:00 | 只看该作者

Q1, 形容词并列, and可缺。

地板
发表于 2004-9-20 09:42:00 | 只看该作者

Hi Jnlvo,

Can you summarize the conditions in which we can omit "and"?

I tried to search but did not find related topic yet. Thanks.

5#
发表于 2004-9-20 11:29:00 | 只看该作者

For parallelism, and is usually needed, but when it links two adjectives/ adjectival phrases, it could be omitted.



Adjectival parallel is exceptional. For example:





930. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.



(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course



(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course



(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately



(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required courseB



(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately







[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-20 11:29:40编辑过]
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-20 12:25:00 | 只看该作者

请教jnlvo,第一题用形容词aspiring 和动词aspire有什么区别呢? Thanks a lot

7#
发表于 2004-9-20 12:40:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得正确答案没错呀,虽然我做错的可能性也很大。Q2中c用in不太好,和前面不一致
8#
发表于 2004-9-20 12:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用miaoyin_tx在2004-9-20 12:25:00的发言:

请教jnlvo,第一题用形容词aspiring 和动词aspire有什么区别呢? Thanks a lot


我是觉得aspiring后面跟了一个复杂的结构,还是用从句比较好点

9#
发表于 2004-9-20 12:51:00 | 只看该作者
Q1就是为了避免把talented, charistmatic的对象混淆为后面的一长串东西,所以要把aspire单列开来
10#
发表于 2004-9-20 13:04:00 | 只看该作者

Jnlvo,你说的只是名词前置修饰语的情况.没错名词前置修饰语语义相同时是可以用逗号隔开的,但不表示用在be动词后面也可以不用and.你有进一步的例子吗?


我只找到一个形容词并列的例子,这里是用了and的.OG155.



155. Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reti­cent. and are suspicious of strangers.



(A)  the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reti­cent, and are


(B)   local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are



(C)  that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reti­cent, and



(D)  local witnesses are difficult to locate and reti­cent, and they are



(E)   that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are






[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-20 13:04:45编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-30 02:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部