GWD-8-23

horsefish · 发表于 2004-9-16 04:29:00

Q23:

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum

speed of eight miles an hour, required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on

handlebars at all times, and it granted pedestrians right-of-way.

A. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,

required of cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times,

and it granted

B. regulated the use of bicycles, mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,

required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times,

granting

C. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,

required cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times,

and it granted

D. regulating the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,

requiring of cyclists that they keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all

times, and granted

E. regulating the use of bicycles mandated a maximum speed of eight miles an hour,

required cyclists to keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and

granted

答案E

我用排除选择的E, 可是不明白bicycles mandated 的关系

ztlbox · 发表于 2004-9-16 04:53:00

regulating the use of bicycles 是ordinance 的定语，应该是ordinance mandated......

bloodcherry · 发表于 2004-9-19 05:36:00

这题答案我没有问题，但是我想问的是B,如果在required前面加个and是不是就可以成立了呢，因为毕竟可以说regulated,required了，伴随着granting的结果...

请指教...

是否两个并列的时候，ETS要求也要在后一个前面加AND?

bloodcherry · 发表于 2004-9-19 22:31:00

自己顶一下

LES · 发表于 2004-9-20 21:01:00

以下是引用bloodcherry在2004-9-19 5:36:00的发言：

这题答案我没有问题，但是我想问的是B,如果在required前面加个and是不是就可以成立了呢，因为毕竟可以说regulated,required了，伴随着granting的结果...

请指教...

－从语法上是可以的，但是逻辑意思上是错误的，你翻译一下就知道了。

是否两个并列的时候，ETS要求也要在后一个前面加AND?－是的！

rings · 发表于 2004-10-9 15:42:00

为什么说是错误的?我觉得granting pedestrians right-of-way是keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times的结果呀!!

版主MM给解释一下

tulipmontreal · 发表于 2004-10-14 05:19:00

最好加上一个逗号呵呵

OasisWater · 发表于 2004-10-14 10:04:00

ordinance后面的修饰一般使用doing（好像ETS很喜欢考这点）；至于楼上rings所说的granting放在句尾作伴随的状况了，除了逻辑方面的原因外；语法上似乎也有问题，那就是granting到底是伴随前面的一个动作还是两个一起呢？

一家之言。。。。。

droppa · 发表于 2004-11-23 14:33:00

感觉意思上很明显，regulating是一部分，有点象总起，mandated blababa这些是具体解释ordinance如何regulating的。

summersmile · 发表于 2005-3-3 12:57:00

想问一下：require of sb. to do sth用法对马？

所属分类: 下线版块