LSAT-22-3-23 倒装句!?

bryan0806

以下是引用valarie在2004-9-10 10:45:00的发言：

My understanding is different

只有当：如果航空公司没有overbooked ，then顾客就不会被forced to take a later  flight的情况下，如果passenger 被denied a seat on a flight for which the passenger has confirmed reservations， airline is morally obliged to compensate the passenger. 言下之意，即使航空公司没有overbooked ， 顾客也被forced to take a later  flight的情况下， airline is not morally obliged.

绕死了！！！

嗯 我想你是对的!!

那我试着回答你的问题  有错请指正!!

A如果成立 则航空公司就要赔偿

反而 反驳了Jamie 而不是 justifies Jamie’s response to LACE>ArnoldLACE>

而C 支持 Jamie  也就是航空公司不需赔偿

我头又晕了!!

lawyer_1

1。对PRICINPLE题，选项实际是将原文抽象的重说一遍（抽象的程度不同），当然也有一种假设型的PRINCIPLE，但重说一遍的占多数。

2。J说：如果没有OVERBOOK（Even if you had not been denied a seat on the earlier flight），你也会坐下一班航班（you would have missed your business meeting anyway）。所以不用补偿。

C原则是：补偿的必要条件是如果没有OVERBOOK，你不必做下一航班。显然，J的意思是A没有满足这个必要条件，所以不用补偿。

A原则是：如果做下一航班的唯一原因是OVERBOOK，则要补偿。这和J说得相差太远。第一：J说得是不补偿的情况，从A原则推不出不补偿的情况。第二：原文也没有说唯一原因。故A不是J的原则

bryan0806

Thanks, lawyer

又学了不少 !!

valarie

it's so simple after you explain it. Thanks

Bensontuo

bryan0806 发表于 2004-9-5 17:26
23.   Arnold: I was recently denied a seat on an airline flight for which I had a confirme ...

Spot the question type: Method of the reasoning - Point at issue of principle.

Core of the argument:

A: Regardless of whether being cancelled due to the bad weather or not, due to the acton of overbooking, A should be compensated for missing his business meetings.

J: Regardless of whether the action of overbooking is existed or not, airline is not morally obligated to compensate A due to the weather cancellation.

So, apparently, J believes that A will never be morally obligated to compensate any passengers with confirmed booking if the flight is cancelled due to the weather conditions.

Let us see the answers.

A. Not to the point discussed.

B. we can't say other reasons to cancel the flight is not sufficient enough to lead to the morality obligation being necessary.

C. If the airline had not overbooked the original flight, it must be true that the passenger would not have been forced to take a later flight. Which is - If Passenger would have been forced to take a later flight, airline had overbooked the original flight. - Perfectly justified J's argument. Which is to say, the condition of you taking the next flight is not due to the weather condition, but due to the overbooking.

D. Weaken J's argument => Passenger is forced to take a later flight, it must be true that original flight is cancelled due to bad weather.  According to J, Airline is"  not morally obligated " to compensate the passengers if the reasons to cancel the flight is because of bad weather.

E. It is out of the scope of the sufficient condition as we are discussing the passenger be forced to take a later flight due to the overbooking but not because other reasons of " not overbooking "