以下是引用leeon在2004-9-2 14:30:00的发言:GEMJ总结
关于代词的指代问题,我想下面几点是明确的: 1) 并无就近指代的规则,如果看到代词就将其等同于前面最靠近它的、在数上与其一致的名词,肯定是错误的。不仅如此,我们也不应该以就近指代的思路想问题; 2) 从句中的做主语的代词优先指代主句主语。这是ETS认可的规则。但注意是“优先”,不是“永远”,否则下面的句子就无法解释了; 12. The Olympic Games helped to keep peace among the pugnacious states of the Greek world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival’s month. (A) world in that a sacred truce was proclaimed during the festival’s month (B) world, proclaiming a sacred truce during the festival’s month (C) world when they proclaimed a sacred truce for the festival month (D) world, for a sacred truce was proclaimed during the month of the festival (E) world by proclamation of a sacred truce that was for the month of the festival 3) 逻辑判定是无比重要的。如果“优先指代”使得句子不通,则需要通过逻辑来判定其指代的对象。当然,这也适合于没有“优先指代”规则可用的情况; 4) 我们不应该试图寻找(实际上也不存在)一条简单的、适用任何情况的通则来判定代词的指代对象。正因为如此,代词的指代问题才具有挑战性,代词指代才能成为ETS喜欢的考点。如果一条简单规则就可以搞定所有题目,那还有考的必要与价值吗?
(好比说前人曾提出的“就近指代”的规则就是一种寻求通则的尝试,但这肯定是错误的。在ETS的字典里,绝对没有这条规则)
OG中确实提到过关于"就近指代"的要求. 请看OG241的explanation,...Besides heat and light cannot logically modify the sun, the nearest noun, as grammar requires it to do. 就是说,根据语法要求, 应该修饰最近的名词. 这应该是个一般性原则,但不是绝对的. |