嗯 看到有人反駁我十一樓的說法 不得不再來講一下
我覺得A的crossing引起岐意 是GMAT的大忌 D中的by 已經把used的意思表達出來了
至於crossing的岐意可參考OG127
127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees’ paychecks, for those of them assigned(B)
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them
In choice A, the phrase assigned by them modifies the adjacent noun, paychecks: the sentence implies that paychecks, rather than employees, work at the United Nations. In C, the phrase having been assigned... is uncertain in reference, making the sentence unclear. By using in place of instead of for, choices D and E create the unidiomatic and redundant construction substitutes x in place of y. Moreover, D, aside from being wordy, is unclear because the pronoun them has no unambiguous antecedent; and in E, their employees to have been assigned by them is wordy and awkward. Choice B, the best answer, properly uses the phrase who have been assigned... to the United Nations to modify employees.
|