真心求教各位NN和斑斑 OG12-Q112 错误选项的解释

蓝若痕

teddy也是个爱思考的好孩子~~我在搜这题的讨论稿呢 翻出这帖啦~
之前提到E的改变了原句的意思，我觉得是不是这样解释
As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision（, which
would deemed legally blind for an adult, ）would be rated about 20/500.

括号那部分中which指代its rudimentary sense of vision，当做修饰语先不看，那么主句就变成了As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500.
这样的话就遗漏了原句作者想表达的关于“adult如果这样会如何的”重要信息。所以改变了原句的意思

gui59106375

teddy也是个爱思考的好孩子~~我在搜这题的讨论稿呢 翻出这帖啦~
之前提到E的改变了原句的意思，我觉得是不是这样解释
As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision（, which
would deemed legally blind for an adult, ）would be rated about 20/500.

括号那部分中which指代its rudimentary sense of vision，当做修饰语先不看，那么主句就变成了As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500.
这样的话就遗漏了原句作者想表达的关于“adult如果这样会如何的”重要信息。所以改变了原句的意思

-- by 会员 蓝若痕 (2012/5/16 13:10:49)

木有错，可我有一个疑问，我觉得大家说的逻辑意思都很好，但是总感觉这样是从正确答案的逻辑倒推别的选项的错误，怎样才能在读原文时就抓住坐着想表达的意思呢

gui59106375

谢谢闪电同学的回答呀~这道题我现在不晕了，但是你对A、B选项的解释我不太赞同哦~

(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it
would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
首先这个it既不是指代vision也不是指代a baby哦~因为如果前面的句子是S+V，代词很明显指代前一句的S，但是由于前句话是S+V+O的结构，而且S、O都是单数，所以那个it是不知道指什么的，自然的后面那个it也就指代不清了。

(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
这句话里面legally blind的主语不是vision，而是a baby~你把主要结构一提，实际上他就变成了，a baby emerges……，or legally blind as an adult。baby是不能作为adult的哦~

此题的关键在于blind一词，因为只有人可以blind, vision不可以blind。别的考点几乎都可以忽略。(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it
would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.这里it指代vision，vision would be legally blind, 错。
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult. that引导定语从句，指代vision， 后面说了blind,错。
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult. 分词后面必须是完整句子。
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which
would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500. which引导定语从句，指代vision, 后面说了blind,错。

-- by 会员 闪电绝影 (2012/2/10 22:43:14)

-- by 会员 teddybearj4 (2012/2/10 23:26:15)

我有一个疑问，我觉得大家说的逻辑意思都很好，但是总感觉这样是从正确答案的逻辑倒推别的选项的错误，怎样才能在读原文时就抓住坐着想表达的意思呢

gui59106375

这题我觉得突破口还是从大处着眼：

1. The baby emerges from the womb
2. The baby's rudimentary sense of vision ~ 20/500
3. If same (~20/500) in an adult -> the adult is considered legally blind
以上算我自己的提纲吧，不考虑语法
信息量就是这3点

然后你就能看到错误选项都没说清楚逻辑关系（特别是第3点），都mixed-up了

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/2/9 21:40:32)

我有一个疑问，我觉得大家说的逻辑意思都很好，但是总感觉这样是从正确答案的逻辑倒推别的选项的逻辑错误，怎样才能在读原文时就抓住坐着想表达的意思呢，我觉得还是要熟悉GMAC出题的结构，对吗？

jorsendon

如果纯从句意理解确实像从正确句倒退出来的，不靠谱

deem 的用法一般是 someone deem something ..., 所以至少应该是 would be deemed

至于说blind的用法，有没有谁找到形容视觉，而不是形容人或物的例子？

babybearmm

Intended meaning确实是从选项A读出来的，不是从先找到正确答案然后再想meaning.

GMAT出题本来就是这样，哪怕A选项再egregious，也会让读者能通过common sense读出来作者想要表达的意思是什么，然后顺着这个意思去找语法和逻辑都正确的且表达作者原意的那个选项。

angelhxl

E选项，which  would deemed legally blind for an adult，这个本身就错误了：would后面至少应该为原型吧，这里是deemed。
另外，这个修饰读起来总觉得别扭，不直接。。。for an adult
这个句子读起来哈残疾

klllun

Intended meaning确实是从选项A读出来的，不是从先找到正确答案然后再想meaning.

GMAT出题本来就是这样，哪怕A选项再egregious，也会让读者能通过common sense读出来作者想要表达的意思是什么，然后顺着这个意思去找语法和逻辑都正确的且表达作者原意的那个选项。

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/21 10:56:01)

baby姐的各种回答，一语惊醒梦中人嘞！谢谢啦

petite_ivy

神帖！很有用！谢谢

Hendy

这个歌好贴啊，几位大牛都现身了