MSF求选校，求问各路英雄Cambridge VS MIT...怎么选？

宇文所乐

乐乐的神贴留名，以后回CD回忆往昔峥嵘岁月的时候留个念想。。。
瞎说一个，我觉得要是想回香港的话，剑桥和MIT区别没有那么悬殊吧。。。留在英国的话就不用过渡期了，而且学费差好多。。。忽略我吧。。。

-- by 会员 37一帘幽梦 (2012/1/31 21:45:47)

亲你们的每一条回复LZ都会很用心的看，忽略不能啊！！

yang1786

I went to Boston this winter break. I love the city, its streets, weather and architectures. The public transportation is really convienience. But MIT is at Cambridge where is separted with Boston city by Charles river. MIT doens't have a traditional campus and it's definitely not a college town. I would choose MIT because I had my college degree in the United States. I wouldn't want to go to another country because all the networks have been built here. And it takes time to adapt to new environment and get yourself around comfortably.

chase2046

学费方面确实差太多了，在英国留学的同学Cambridge应该就和Harvard差不多吧（我臆想的）。选Cambridge。

宇文所乐

Cambridge is no longer the Cambridge it used to be. Even if u got ad from Finance/F&E of LSE, it still strongly dominates Cam MPhil Finance, not to say MIT finance, a definitely top 5 dept all over the world. For reputation perspective, in either China or HK, MIT overwhelms Cam as well. UK is not the old UK itself as well. Regarding faculty, MIT has R Merton, S Ross in asset pricing and S Myers in Corp Fin, both of whom are cornerstones of the development of modern finance, along with other extremely superb profs like J Cox, A Lo, Jiang Wang, Jun Pan, well, u name it, working on the cutting edge of finance. While Cam has what? A pile of craps and some void fame it accumulated centuries long ago. So if you wanna learn some 'real stuff', not matter academic or  practical, and if money is not the concern ,go for MIT for sure, and throw Cam's offer into the trash! PS: if u understand some research stuff, and know JF,JFE and RFS, MIT is always among the top tie in publication #, while Cam, was, is and most likely will be, always a joke.  Bear in mind, with respect to finance, the UK ranking would always be LBS>Ox=LSE>the rest. http://wpcarey.asu.edu/fin-rankings/rankings/results.cfm

-- by 会员 kc08 (2012/1/31 21:46:06)

我也认同MIT>Cambridge，但是不清楚它们之间的gap有多大。
英国我觉得Cambridge=Oxford=LSE，高手过招，很难去硬分个高低。LBS的好名声来自他家MBA，这所不说了，商科不是oxbridge强项，念商的人更多是被学校本身吸引去的，LSE在伦敦中心的中心，银行就在学校门口，networking机会比伦敦外的学校真的多太多了。。。

宇文所乐

这两个项目是一个档次的吗?除了学费外.....

-- by 会员 ipo123 (2012/1/31 22:48:41)

请问ipo123觉得这两个项目不是一个档次的吗？ 能展开说说么？谢谢！：）

elva2sam

这两个学校从找工作的角度来看有差别么？不明白为什么学费会差这么多！！！完全无法JUSTIFY呀
HK的IB分UK TARGET和US TARGET. 剑桥是UK NO.1， MIT恐怕还不敢说自己是US NO.1吧。

另外我觉得剑桥的文化底蕴和学术氛围是其他学校不能比的。

Karmalot

这两个学校从找工作的角度来看有差别么？不明白为什么学费会差这么多！！！完全无法JUSTIFY呀
HK的IB分UK TARGET和US TARGET. 剑桥是UK NO.1， MIT恐怕还不敢说自己是US NO.1吧。

另外我觉得剑桥的文化底蕴和学术氛围是其他学校不能比的。

-- by 会员 elva2sam (2012/2/1 1:41:36)

问题是商科的研究生恐怕cam也不好说自己no.1吧，不同项目在就业上也不能一概而论啊，MIT就算不是US NO.1也是TOP TIER，HYPSM本来就类似Oxbridge，肯定都是tier 1 target；当然我觉得学校和项目能保证进面试基本就可以了

waynerao

留名飘过。。。乐乐大神

zbb88

楼主自己抓阄吧。这里大部分人2所学校都没呆过，给不出建议的。

cerise0121

留在英国吧亲...
不然我万一一个人在不知道什么学校里读水校很苦的...

可是这样说的话万一我回国工作去了了岂不是太辜负你了...哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈...