哈,我就是看你的贴子才发现原先自己没理解unaccompanied还有这么多意思,怪不得OG说ambiguous... 你说: unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous? 我的理解,否定的形容词后面再加副词,感觉确实有歧义 OPTION A. NOT (accompanied correspondingly) by OPTION B. (not accompanied) CORRESPONDINGLY by 不知道我表示清楚没有,括号里是一个意群 就算OPTION A里面,NOT () 这种,也分为部分否定和全否定,是"accompanied但非correspondingly",还是"压根就没有accompanied"? OPTION B其实就是"非accompanied,但是这个非accompanied的状态是correspondingly" 而E. If not accompanied by corresponding ... 就很清晰
赞ls,很透彻啊~ -- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:14:08)
O(∩_∩)O~前两个点是搜以前的帖子找到的前辈的话,然后第三个是自己词典找的,不过还是有个疑问,unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous? -- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/1/20 17:34:43)
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:52:49)
但unaccompanied correspondingly就已经否定accompanied,(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……你看成了 not accompanied correspondingly 以下是引用oncross在2006-7-4 4:23:00的发言: Did MM refer to OG10-37: 37.While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course. (A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course (B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course (C) if it is taught only as a course required separately (D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course(B) (E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.现在我也混了,还是表想这么多啦,通过unaccompany和not accompany或者when和if就可以排除鸟~~抓紧总结下一题,og总结真是很费时费精力的事情,一起加油咯!!
现在我也混了,还是表想这么多啦,通过unaccompany和not accompany或者when和if就可以排除鸟~~抓紧总结下一题,og总结真是很费时费精力的事情,一起加油咯!! |