ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2295|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

诚心求教GWD 5 Q3

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-15 11:32:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.

A.    rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room
B.    rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through triage in a hospital emergency room
C.    rules intending to ensure at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage
D.    with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage
E.    and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room


答案选a,不明白E为什么不对。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-1-15 21:55:06 | 只看该作者
最直接的一点,E的this裸奔,秒杀了。。。
板凳
发表于 2012-1-15 21:58:10 | 只看该作者
最直接的一点,E的this裸奔,秒杀了。。。
-- by 会员 michaelmay17 (2012/1/15 21:55:06)



你又来了!!救星!!!
地板
发表于 2012-1-15 22:01:09 | 只看该作者
最直接的一点,E的this裸奔,秒杀了。。。
-- by 会员 michaelmay17 (2012/1/15 21:55:06)




你又来了!!救星!!!
-- by 会员 louislyn (2012/1/15 21:58:10)

.............不敢当,你加油~
5#
发表于 2012-2-6 20:49:52 | 只看该作者
求问C为什么不对~~ ?!!不是法律法规要用ing形式么? 为什么不能intending 做rules 的定语呢?
6#
发表于 2012-2-6 21:39:49 | 只看该作者
求问C为什么不对~~ ?!!不是法律法规要用ing形式么? 为什么不能intending 做rules 的定语呢?
-- by 会员 attractg (2012/2/6 20:49:52)

这样理解吧:rule本身不能intend,是被用来intend的,而且C中的ensure后少了that,这个比较致命
7#
发表于 2012-2-6 21:42:55 | 只看该作者
求问C为什么不对~~ ?!!不是法律法规要用ing形式么? 为什么不能intending 做rules 的定语呢?
-- by 会员 attractg (2012/2/6 20:49:52)

c的put through triage修饰错,这个比较严重,然后ensure后少that容易歧义,然后a其实是省略了which is,法律法规的问题么,不算是correctness的错误,所以这里就没有体现,个人看法
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 21:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部