ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2190|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[argument] Argu100~ 求拍

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-11 00:02:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In this argument,the arguer assumes that a jazz music club in Monroe would be tremendously profitable. To bolster the conclusion, the arguer assumes that jazz music is especially popular in Monroe based on the evidence that over 100,00 people attended Monroe's annul jazz festival last summer, and that Jazz Nightly is the highest-rated radio program in Monroe; In addition, the arguer assumes that large number of well-known jazz musicians owning homes in Monroe can contribute to the jazz's popularity there ; Meanwhile the arguer cites the result of a recent nationwide study that the typical jazz fan spends nearly $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment to substantiate the assumption that jazz music club can make tremendous profits. Although this argument seems reasonable in the first glance, it is in fact ill-conceived. The reasons are stated as follows.

In the first place, the arguer assumes that jazz music is extremely popular in Monroe. Since over 100,00 people attended Monroe's annual jazz festival last summer, and that 'Jazz Nightly' is the highest-rated radio program in Monroe. Firstly, it is possible that most of the people who attended the annual jazz festival last summer were tourists, and they came to Monroe not mainly for the jazz festival, maybe they were attracted by the comfortable weather, or the long history culture of the city, and so on. Even though those people are native there, it is possible that so many people attending the festival last summer was an aberration.Maybe the jazz festival last summer made a large appealing advertisement and made some special award that attracted so many people. Secondly, the radio program 'Jazz Nightly' is the highest-rated in Monroe cannot necessarily prove that jazz music is popular in Monroe. Since it is possible that people like the host of 'Jazz Nightly' rather than the jazz music, or the other radio programs are far too worse than 'Jazz Nightly', thus people have to chose 'Jazz Nightly'. All these take the assumption that jazz music is very popular in Monroe into a question.

In the second place, the arguer points out that there are numbers of well-known jazz musicians owning homes in Monroe. Along with this fact, the arguer seems to assume that these famous musicians will bring Monroe a jazz spring, making jazz a hot issue in Monroe, thus a jazz club there would be profitable. However, it is suspicious that these musicians can really make some contribution to jazz popularity there. It is possible that people used to like these musicians and now have not any interest in them. Even if people are still love this musicians, they don't necessarily come to Monroe to listen to jazz music, not alone joining a jazz club there. Since people can enjoy jazz through the TV, the CD, or the computer.Thus these musicians living in Monroe don't necessarily be a favorable factor for jazz club's tremendous profits.

Last but not least, the arguer cites a recent nation survey that the typical jazz fan spends nearly $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. It seems that the arguer assumes that it can be a direct evidence to prove that a jazz club would be profitable. However, the arguer cannot guarantee that typical jazz fan in Monroe also will spend about $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment, since it is possible that people in Monroe is commonly not affluent and won't spend much money on jazz entertainment even if they love jazz very much. Furthermore, even if  typical jazz fan in Monroe also spend much money on jazz entertainment, it doesn't mean that other people will spend so much on it, and it is very likely that the typical jazz fan in Monroe is just a small part of the people there, thus a jazz club there cannot necessarily make tremendous profits.

To sum up, the arguer's predication that a jazz club in Monroe would be tremendous profitable based on three assumptions concerning the jazz's popularity there, many famous jazz musicians there, and a recent nation survey relating to typical jazz fan's considerable expenditure on jazz entertainment. However, the evidences which used to support the assumptions are not so persuasive and thus lead the predication to a unconvincing one.    

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-1-11 01:08:14 | 只看该作者
写的不错,展开了。
板凳
发表于 2012-1-11 22:43:12 | 只看该作者
恩,这个是不是修改之后的啊,感觉很不错了。
地板
发表于 2012-1-12 00:13:40 | 只看该作者
I think you should call the "arguer" the writer instead.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-12 14:59:39 | 只看该作者
没修改过  不过没掐时间 。。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-12 15:01:04 | 只看该作者
THX~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-12 15:01:20 | 只看该作者
THX~
8#
发表于 2012-1-12 20:23:43 | 只看该作者
did you write this? I like this one the best!
9#
发表于 2012-1-12 20:39:29 | 只看该作者
To sum up, the arguer's predication that a jazz club in Monroe would be tremendous profitable based on three assumptions concerning the jazz's popularity there, many famous jazz musicians there, and a recent nation survey relating to typical jazz fan's considerable expenditure on jazz entertainment. However, the evidences which used to support the assumptions are not so persuasive and thus lead the predication to a unconvincing one.    

VS

To sum it up, the writer's predication that a jazz club in Monroe would be tremendously profitable based on three assumptions concerning jazz's popularity there, many famous jazz musicians there and a recent nation survey relating to typical jazz fan's considerable expenditure on jazz entertainment. However, these evidences which are used to support the assumptions are not persuasive enough and thus make the predication to a unconvincing one.    

Not a big difference just really little things... very good!
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-13 12:54:53 | 只看该作者
THX~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-10 06:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部