Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did. 根据og的解释,只说分词protecting引导了一个词组来解释shields干了什么.我觉得les这里把protecting引导的短语解释为原因状语太牵强了. 感觉不是状语,是定语.以前brave mba gg解释的很清楚了. 下面贴出以前讨论中的话 Q og39,49,229 -ing at the end of the sentence ,after a comma 49. The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known in orbit around doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known that orbit OG229, .... the technique degrades major works of art, likening it to putting lipstick on a Greek status. Answer 39、the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did,动作的发起者就是shields,句子主语。 T39 感觉是定语,修饰句子主语 T49 感觉是结果状语 49、这里modify the preceding clause,现在分词在句尾,可以做定语、伴随状语、目的状语(结果状语)。我认为这里做结果状语。比较灵活,要根据句子意思来判断。 现在分词做定语时,其一定有修饰对象,一般情况下,在句尾做定语,其逻辑主语是句子主语,但是还是要根据句子意思来判断; 做状语时,如果是表示伴随动作,一般情况下是修饰主句的动作谓语;如果做伴随结果,是修饰整个句子。 所以,以上主要都是通过句子意思来判断的。 animal-hide shields with wooden frames protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears were essential items of military equipment 只不过分词短语放在主谓之间太累赘,所以放在了句尾。还记得TOEFL里有很多这样的分词做定语的形式吗? 如果分词修饰的是名词,一定是做定语;如果修饰的是谓语动词,通常是伴随动作状语;如果修饰的整个句子,通常是结果状语,例如第二题。 这要根据句子意思,如果修饰的是句子主语或者就近的名词,就是定语;如果修饰的是动词或者是句子,则是状语。 只是说现分在句尾优先做状语,但是不是不能做定语,OG39不是表示伴随的含义。而OG229我认为是状语,感觉应该是修饰整个句子,因为说的是“把....比做”,是将的technique degrades major works of art的这个过程。 不过,这个差异我认为并不是特别影响做题。所以更凸现句子意思的重要性。 现在分词修饰,没有逗号的规则,即其在即可做定语也可做状语,要根据句子意思。OG39的PROTECTING我认为就是定语,修饰主语,只不过如果放在主语后太长,显得罗嗦,所以置后了。做状语从意思上觉得很难讲通。不过此题句子成分并不影响做题。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-6 8:25:53编辑过] |