一道manhattan to what结构VS同位语

OO335722076

dddddddddddddddddddddddd

OO335722076

upuuppupupup

OO335722076

ddddddddddddddd

OO335722076

upupupup

OO335722076

upupoupupu

OO335722076

upupuo

OO335722076

upupup

OO335722076

ddddddddd

jamesyl327

At the time of the Mexican agrarian revoution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of [ land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards]

我来解释一下吧~
这道题的意思是， propose a return to commuanl ownership of land, (a return) to what  had been pre-COlumbian form of ownership. 如果选B的话 那个a form of 就是修饰Land了~可是land 跟a form of完全不搭边~

所以这道题再次印证了，GMAT语法考得是逻辑 这一观点

OO335722076

At the time of the Mexican agrarian revoution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of [ land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards]

我来解释一下吧~
这道题的意思是， propose a return to commuanl ownership of land, (a return) to what  had been pre-COlumbian form of ownership. 如果选B的话 那个a form of 就是修饰Land了~可是land 跟a form of完全不搭边~

所以这道题再次印证了，GMAT语法考得是逻辑 这一观点

-- by 会员 jamesyl327 (2011/11/11 16:25:49)

 终于有人回复了

我想问下我们经常用同位语来解决定语从句就近修饰的问题   而且证明这是GMAC 的perference  这里的a form为什么是修饰land  而不是修饰ownership？ 加一句prep对同位语的解释“a)起修饰语的作用,一般用于修饰名词或名词短语；同位语解释的是整个名词，不是名短中某个词，故同位语不是核心词修饰。”   而且从来没遇到过说同位语像which一样有就近修饰的问题啊？

还有我看了解释啊  他说to what是定语从句  也就像to which一样 并不是省略了a return  而且如果是（a return）to what  那更不逻辑了吧  return怎么会成为一个form呢？  
感谢帮助