不好意思,我在刨根问底一下。
og 56题跟我上面问的那题结构几乎一样,都是主语+谓语+宾语+without结构,但是这题为什么就没有语法上的修饰歧义呢?
56)Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.
(A) huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport
(B) without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya
(C) the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
(D) there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya(C)
(E) were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, built huge palace and temple clusters
还有og113题里,“ ,with arms and legs hanging” 有没有可能造成是修饰主句“Vistors……have often looked up……and seen ……” 的歧义?
113)Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline.
(A) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang
(B) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs were hanging
(C) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging
(D) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging(D)
(E) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung
我当时选113题是用的排除法,因为whose从句的歧义太明显了,所以只好在with结构里面选。但是,我记得前人说过with独立主格可以表示原因、伴随、结果,是用来补充说明主句的。但在这题里,好像不是。这个with独立主格,到底可以修饰多少句子成分?
请斑竹继续执教!bow~~~~
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-19 6:11:57编辑过] |