ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: WONDERLAND2004
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD Set 6 T8

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2004-8-7 01:40:00 | 只看该作者

that of 的问题我也觉得很别扭,但做题的时候我首先就把view as排除了,我都没注意that of的问题。看来以后不能太武断。想想我给that of找的理由的却牵强。

view sth as+noun, view sth to be +adj, consider好像就是这个用法,不过consider noun1 noun2 和consider noun to be adj,这个和act as actor不一样,actor是名词,自然用不着to be。如果说balanced可以看成名词的省略形式,那as和to be的混用就不是错误了。本来想在og里搜个例子,发现没有,看来可能是我错了。

还有就是for the foreseeable future,好像都是和将来时连用。

总之偶还是不太明白,觉得SC的最大问题不是看不出错,而是把对的也看成错的。

谢谢stoneren!

12#
发表于 2004-8-11 00:01:00 | 只看该作者

我跟楼主有同样的疑问。首先我看到A的时候觉得view...as balanced是有问题的,但是看完所有选项之后发现,其它选项错的更多。所以最后选了A。但是对这个view...as balanced一直耿耿于怀。哪位能再给讲讲啊?理解为省略economy好象也有问题:如果可以这么理解的话,那应该所有的do sth. as adj. 都可以理解为do sth. as adj. (sth.), 那as 带adj. 也就再也不是个错误了。

至于D,我觉得除了between...and..后的结构不平行以外,这个that就没有指代对象啊?指代economy的话逻辑上讲不通。所以D肯定不对。

13#
发表于 2004-8-11 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

刚从大全里查到一个例句,看来这个用法是可以的。

8.     A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.

14#
发表于 2004-10-8 21:27:00 | 只看该作者

顶一下,想问问.

viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,

help me out ,谢谢

15#
发表于 2004-10-13 09:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用philikittist在2004-8-6 17:16:00的发言:

大家对这道题的答案没有意见了么?我觉得view sth as+adj是常考的错误呀。我选D。请大家解惑。



OG 147:


        Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.


(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than


(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as


(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as


(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather thanE


(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than


In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like.... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be.... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to Samuel Sewall... was viewed....



16#
发表于 2004-10-19 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

UP.

想问一下14楼一样的问题:“viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,”

PS. 大家好象都能直接引别人的话,然后在上面改。。。?怎么弄的?谢谢

17#
发表于 2004-12-4 09:43:00 | 只看该作者
看到AS头就晕。
18#
发表于 2004-12-4 19:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用camcam在2004-12-4 9:43:00的发言:
看到AS头就晕。

看到AS就狂喜:加10分!

19#
发表于 2005-1-1 22:47:00 | 只看该作者

再顶一下,想问问.

viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,

我就是看到这个才排除A,B的

20#
发表于 2005-1-13 17:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jerryyang在2005-1-1 22:47:00的发言:

再顶一下,想问问.


viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,


我就是看到这个才排除A,B的


欧也是, 正在总结GWD 的SC,但是这题让我费解,觉得在这里用分词结构会产生歧义viewing 的逻辑主语是模糊的。大家继续讨论。。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 12:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部