ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: paopao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og240

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-11-6 16:12:00 | 只看该作者

以下是引用paopao在2004-7-11 8:17:00的发言:


我的理解是这样的


A special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.was bringing the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War .


不知哪里错了


句子结构:...price increase... was bringing... company back....


OG解释:It may help to imagine a simplified version of the sentence and substitute the other answer choices for “The price increase was what brought...”


D Bringing suggests an ongoing condition and is incompatible with an action that was completed shortly after the Second World War.


两个句子结构根本不一样吧

12#
发表于 2005-12-6 22:06:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(jnlvo)was bringing ....shortly after意思表...

以下是引用jnlvo在2004-7-12 0:04:00的发言:

was bringing ....shortly after意思表达不是很合理after时间范围太广,此时用brought更清楚。


就算was bringing 可以,bringing也不可倒装,没见过进行时倒装

坚决的同意这个说法!进行时态都要有很明白的时间点作时间状语!
13#
发表于 2006-2-15 13:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用guhuo在2005-2-2 13:16:00的发言:


现分句首找逻辑主语,整个句子没有任何断句,更不用说逻辑主语了。

What brought the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War was a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.


governmentally sanctioned price increase 不就是邏輯主語了嗎?governmentally 前有逗號不就是斷句了嗎?


這樣不就是Bringing…



a special, governmentally sanctioned price increase 是一个名词词组,special,是修饰price increase的形容词,根本不是断句special和另一各形容词governmentally sanctioned中间用逗号断开

14#
发表于 2006-2-15 13:39:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wingkim在2005-11-6 16:12:00的发言:

以下是引用paopao在2004-7-11 8:17:00的发言:


我的理解是这样的


A special, governmentally sanctioned price increase allowed during a period of wage and price controls.was bringing the automobile company back from the verge of bankruptcy shortly after the Second World War .


不知哪里错了


句子结构:...price increase... was bringing... company back....


OG解释:It may help to imagine a simplified version of the sentence and substitute the other answer choices for “The price increase was what brought...”


D Bringing suggests an ongoing condition and is incompatible with an action that was completed shortly after the Second World War.


两个句子结构根本不一样吧


首先没见过进行时态用倒装

其次,即使倒装可以,时态也不对was bringing 和后面时间状语shortly after the Second World War. 不匹配

15#
发表于 2008-5-5 19:59:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 17:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部