OG 198。。

lost_my_account · 发表于 2004-7-10 23:49:00

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only 24 days.

A.

C. they had for any previous campaign

D.in their previous campaigns

E. for any previous campaigns

我接受关于应该用had had的说法，但是对这个for 实在越来越不理解。。

大N们快救命啊。。。

tianwan · 发表于 2004-7-11 00:31:00

far more supplies than (（those/the supplies/what） they had had) for any previous campaigns

than在比较时可以起到代词的作用。也就是than可以起到than （those/the supplies/what）的作用。

lost_my_account · 发表于 2004-7-11 00:35:00

那为什么for比in好呢？

sunshining · 发表于 2004-7-13 17:25:00

tianwan斑竹，能不能再给点than在比较中做代词的例子？

还有，就是，they had had的主谓结构什么时候能省啊？通常不是用主语(省略助动词)吗？

谢谢

valarie · 发表于 2004-7-23 01:15:00

那为什么E 中不是 “for any previous compaigns"? 为什么没有s? 如果是 “for its previous compaigns" 对么？

valarie · 发表于 2004-7-23 01:16:00

太好了，我又可以回贴了。哈哈

jollypie · 发表于 2004-9-5 12:52:00

谢谢Tianwan斑竹，解决了我正想问的问题！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-5 12:57:05编辑过]

tqbiao · 发表于 2005-1-18 17:12:00

以下是引用tianwan在2004-7-11 0:31:00的发言：

far more supplies than (（those/the supplies/what） they had had) for any previous campaigns

than在比较时可以起到代词的作用。也就是than可以起到than （those/the supplies/what）的作用。

不同意这种补全方式,they had had前面并没有呀，我觉的直接补一个supplies就ok了，就是一个介词宾语的比较亚，

linda05312 · 发表于 2005-1-21 06:17:00

以下是引用valarie在2004-7-23 1:15:00的发言：
那为什么E 中不是 “for any previous compaigns"? 为什么没有s? 如果是 “for its previous compaigns" 对么？

I don't think you can use “for its previous compaigns" here,

for you can't compare the supplies for one compaign to the supplies for previous compaigns.

seasnow · 发表于 2005-12-15 03:10:00

我觉得用for的原因是supply for的搭配

所属分类: 下线版块