ChaseDream
搜索
1234567
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: fair_sword
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd3-34

[复制链接]
61#
发表于 2007-12-23 10:39:00 | 只看该作者
up
62#
发表于 2008-2-23 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

答案是D.见出处nytimes

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B07E1D81F3CF931A25755C0A961958260

题目仅仅是替换了一些名词而已。

Further, retail analysts say that sporting-goods shoppers, unlike those in department stores, do very little shopping around -- someone who comes in for soccer cleats leaves with soccer cleats alone, not impulsively buying a bike and a pair of skis as well

我们可以注意下alone和only的用法。老美如果说“只买两个苹果”,肯定是Buy 2 apples only 而不是only buy 2 apples

63#
发表于 2008-6-9 08:35:00 | 只看该作者

首先shoppers...,unlike those in ...

其次,C中句子里do very little...和do not buy...中间没有连词

D呢,;
                
someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and (will)not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well. 所以选D

64#
发表于 2008-10-9 21:51:00 | 只看该作者

这个提出的有问题。

nytimes原文用的是 not buying...

丫改成 and not buy..

一字之差,巨awkward.

但是someone论个体行为是有道理的

this is the only takw away.

done

65#
发表于 2009-6-15 16:59:00 | 只看该作者

有一个问题:someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well。这里为什么要用将来时,是因为要和之前的comes对比,表示一种发生次序吗?谢谢

66#
发表于 2009-7-7 10:31:00 | 只看该作者
up
67#
发表于 2009-10-20 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
13楼携隐的解释很清楚,推荐去看下
68#
发表于 2011-10-24 17:38:23 | 只看该作者
怎么那么多贴都没人来解释这里有not为什么是and不是or?
都不是很清楚吗
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 23:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部