HELP~!!!!og12 sc101 唯一一道being对的，不明白啊~！！ 求NN相助~！

shimisi69

好贴！解释的很详细?

bob9603

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-582244-1-1.html

Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.


A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.==>划线句是插入句，暂时不看。如此主句就是Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action，那么那个it是指代什么？根据就近原则是a course of action,解释的通嘛？何况插入句也有这个问题，所以这句话读下来的感觉就是non sense


B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.==>一样划线的是插入暂时不看，who is heavily。。。。action是对executive的描述，所以也可以暂时不看，那么整个句子就是An executive makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.，这个意思读不通。还有那个ones指代谁？一般指代的话必须是单复数相同才能指代，也就是说executive能说one,但是不能说ones，反之依然。如果必须出现单复不同的那么就要把先行词重复一遍（mahnan SC bible上说的），反正这句话读下来跟A一样，non sense


C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient troublewhen they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.è这句话到An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear这边还是读的懂得，意思清楚，但是especially if it has worked well in the past，这个it指代谁呢？a course of action？所以指代不清楚，意思有问题


D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.  èOG里的某道解释已经说了Executives’ being heavily committed这种表达叫做wordy，awkward。而且即便这句话可行吧，插入句划去那么那个them就是指代executives了，但是这种指代是错误的，不能指代所有格总得东西，bible里有说。此外插入句里那个it也还是指代有问题，把前面的任何一个单数名词放进去句子都是non sense


E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appearè一般出现being是不对的，都会认为是wordy，但是bible也说了，在近几年GMAC在把being弄成正确的选项中出现。但是只有当其他选项都是有语法问题的时候，而有being的选项是除了being外没有任何的语法问题的情况下，可视为正确的选项。而这个选项的语法是没有问题的：把插入先去掉，Being heavily committed to a course of action is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear。意思读得要比前面的4个选项都要清楚明了，指代them/they都是指代相同的东西，插入句中的one，其实要比it指代的广泛。Bible说了one是泛指，it是真的特定指代先行词的

-- by 会员 清飞扬 (2011/8/12 22:05:12)

小菜由于又要考gmat了，所以又拜读了大侠的段子，感觉很有收获，但同时也有一些不明白的麻烦您给小菜我指点指点哈~

问题1： 关于选项B，您说one没有指代~我想请教您一下，我觉得前面的 a course of action 不是单数的名词短语吗，正好也是在one的前面，可不可以这么指代呢？
问题2： 这个问题可能有点大，但还是想麻烦您~
              就是关于one和 it的指代，我看这道题有很多关于one和it的指代，我现在有点混淆“就近指代”和指代“句子主语”这两个概念了，麻烦您具体说一下哈~小菜我感激不尽~先谢谢啦~！！！！！

清飞扬

小菜由于又要考gmat了，所以又拜读了大侠的段子，感觉很有收获，但同时也有一些不明白的麻烦您给小菜我指点指点哈~

问题1： 关于选项B，您说one没有指代~我想请教您一下，我觉得前面的 a course of action 不是单数的名词短语吗，正好也是在one的前面，可不可以这么指代呢？
问题2： 这个问题可能有点大，但还是想麻烦您~
              就是关于one和 it的指代，我看这道题有很多关于one和it的指代，我现在有点混淆“就近指代”和指代“句子主语”这两个概念了，麻烦您具体说一下哈~小菜我感激不尽~先谢谢啦~！！！！！

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/2/1 20:05:06)

人是不断成长的，对这道题的理解也在不断的改变。最近发了个帖子就是关于这道题的，我想你看了以后应该会清楚很多了。关于being的，ones的用法，非常非常的具体。前后加在一起费了我不少时间。我自己也透彻多了

OG12-101 分析
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-649919-1-1.html?postid=15842311&searchmode=TopicContent&searchtext=Heavy%20commitment%20by%20an%20e


如果你有问题可以短消息我。我现在很难得来语法板块了。今天看到你的帖子真的好巧^_^

wish you good luck and kill GMAT,一起加油！

有理想没有钱

mark..................

pirate舟

“过分依赖于一套做法，尤其是这套做法在过去一直很好用，会很容易让一个经理忽视一些初期问题的信号，或者当这些信号出现的时候曲解了他们。”

littleyya

讨教being用法。。谢谢各位

cheesencat

“下个正确句子，遇到某种语法现象就在里面查查，然后就知道该怎么用了~”
thx!

ximenheng

mark

ponta

og12 sc 101

101. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of
action, especially if it has worked well in the past,
makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or
misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpret them when they do
appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action, especially one that worked well
in the past, makes missing signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they
do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret
signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,
especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting them when they do
appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action,
especially one that has worked well in the past,
is likely to make an executive miss signs of
incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they
do appear.

答案是E，我不明白为什么，求NN相助啊，抱拳啦~！！！O(∩_∩)O

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/8/12 17:11:40)

这道题是2个月前做的，今天再看，我不会这么解释。

这道题，在曼哈顿网站里RON有具体的解释，确实突破点主要是代词+idiom(likely的使用）

可是最后选E用being的原因，皆在于error > wordy。 being存在仅仅是wordy不是error，你可以用他，但是必须最后用他。我记得曼哈顿书里说过一句话：you should notice this partten, but you can't fall in love with it. 永远把concise放在最后考虑

A。有错：RON解释说Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action这个说法有一种native speaker才能看出来的awkward，如果我把by an executive 先不看的话，是heavy commitment to a course of action. 因为根据意思to a course of action是修饰heavy commitment的，而不是by an executive的。根据目前在讨论的那张帖子，我根据曼哈顿书里的那个to do 结构不能修饰没有生命性名词表示目的的说法，这种表达是错误的：帖子见此：http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-596729-1-1.html

此外：make it likely to do sth, 这个结构根据RON说表达不对，因为虽然有make it adj to do sth的说法，可是这个it是作为it reference指代后面的to do sth的，（见曼哈顿SC书P231)  ; 但是这里用likely做ADJ来表达就有问题了；likely的表达一般是：be likely to do sth，be likely that svo 所以这种make it likely to do的用法不对

B。 likely用法也错误---这个是错误，error，不是preference/wordy的问题；还有ones用法错应该是them；one是indefinite的指代，them是definite指代。根据曼哈顿的one解释，可以说：某人吃了很多巧克力中的某一块的时候，应该用one,而不是it，因为是某一块；当说这块味道如何的时候应该用it来指代这个one所表达的某一块。这个it就特定指代这个某一块；所以这里的ones毫无意义，这里是特定指代，指代when they do appear的那些signals

C. if it has worked well in the past中的it指代有问题，it可以指代a course of action，同时也能够指代：incipient trouble ；不要以it不能指代介词中宾语为理由，认为it应该只能指代a course of action； 在C这个句子中committed to a course of action, 这个to是介词，因为TO+N，这个to是做介词用的，所以a course of action就是宾语了，所以既然两个都是宾语，IT指代就有问题了，属于有多个先行词的错误指代情况

D. makes them likely to 这个them用法错误, 不是idiom的用法，没有听到过make them adj to do sth的说法。此外makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear. 代词指代容易有连贯性，一连窜的them容易指代同一个先行词，那么make them中的them更加有问题

E。有being的wordy问题，但是没有语法错误，指代，idiom表达都对

-- by 会员 清飞扬 (2011/10/6 23:11:20)

求问A解释中判定"Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action“错误的原因！ 感觉这里的 to a course of action中”to“只是对应commitment的介词，并未牵扯到'to do 结构不能修饰没有生命性名词表示目的的说法'呀

cuteyaoyao

谢谢大家的解释 清晰了很多XD