ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: bob9603
打印 上一主题 下一主题

HELP~!!!!og12 sc101 唯一一道being对的,不明白啊~!! 求NN相助~!

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2011-10-6 21:30:23 | 只看该作者
其实我是来找解释的。。。看到清飞扬的的签名档热泪盈眶。。。
12#
发表于 2011-10-6 22:08:02 | 只看该作者
@清飞扬:

我感觉你划掉的那句话是这道题很重要的一个出题点,也是OG想考的一点,代词的指代问题。
13#
发表于 2011-10-6 22:34:32 | 只看该作者
其实我是来找解释的。。。看到清飞扬的的签名档热泪盈眶。。。
-- by 会员 wholovecat (2011/10/6 21:30:23)



why
14#
发表于 2011-10-6 23:11:20 | 只看该作者
og12 sc 101

101. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of
action, especially if it has worked well in the past,
makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or
misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpret them when they do
appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action, especially one that worked well
in the past, makes missing signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they
do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret
signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,
especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting them when they do
appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action,
especially one that has worked well in the past,
is likely to make an executive miss signs of
incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they
do appear.

答案是E,我不明白为什么,求NN相助啊,抱拳啦~!!!O(∩_∩)O
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/8/12 17:11:40)



这道题是2个月前做的,今天再看,我不会这么解释。

这道题,在曼哈顿网站里RON有具体的解释,确实突破点主要是代词+idiom(likely的使用)

可是最后选E用being的原因,皆在于error > wordy。 being存在仅仅是wordy不是error,你可以用他,但是必须最后用他。我记得曼哈顿书里说过一句话:you should notice this partten, but you can't fall in love with it. 永远把concise放在最后考虑

A。有错:RON解释说Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action这个说法有一种native speaker才能看出来的awkward,如果我把by an executive 先不看的话,是heavy commitment to a course of action. 因为根据意思to a course of action是修饰heavy commitment的,而不是by an executive的。根据目前在讨论的那张帖子,我根据曼哈顿书里的那个to do 结构不能修饰没有生命性名词表示目的的说法,这种表达是错误的:帖子见此:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-596729-1-1.html

此外:make it likely to do sth, 这个结构根据RON说表达不对,因为虽然有make it adj to do sth的说法,可是这个it是作为it reference指代后面的to do sth的,(见曼哈顿SC书P231)  ; 但是这里用likely做ADJ来表达就有问题了;likely的表达一般是:be likely to do sth,be likely that svo 所以这种make it likely to do的用法不对

B。 likely用法也错误---这个是错误,error,不是preference/wordy的问题;还有ones用法错应该是them;one是indefinite的指代,them是definite指代。根据曼哈顿的one解释,可以说:某人吃了很多巧克力中的某一块的时候,应该用one,而不是it,因为是某一块;当说这块味道如何的时候应该用it来指代这个one所表达的某一块。这个it就特定指代这个某一块;所以这里的ones毫无意义,这里是特定指代,指代when they do appear的那些signals

C. if it has worked well in the past中的it指代有问题,it可以指代a course of action,同时也能够指代:incipient trouble ;不要以it不能指代介词中宾语为理由,认为it应该只能指代a course of action; 在C这个句子中committed to a course of action, 这个to是介词,因为TO+N,这个to是做介词用的,所以a course of action就是宾语了,所以既然两个都是宾语,IT指代就有问题了,属于有多个先行词的错误指代情况

D. makes them likely to 这个them用法错误, 不是idiom的用法,没有听到过make them adj to do sth的说法。此外makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear. 代词指代容易有连贯性,一连窜的them容易指代同一个先行词,那么make them中的them更加有问题

E。有being的wordy问题,但是没有语法错误,指代,idiom表达都对
15#
发表于 2011-10-6 23:42:37 | 只看该作者
这道题,说真的,我盯着他看已经不下20遍了,总算有一次是我自己能用语法来说服自己的了
16#
发表于 2011-10-7 00:06:38 | 只看该作者
og12 sc 101

101. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of
action, especially if it has worked well in the past,
makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or
misinterpret them when they do appear.

(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpret them when they do
appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action, especially one that worked well
in the past, makes missing signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they
do appear.

(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a
course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret
signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,
especially if it has worked well in the past.

(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course
of action, especially if it has worked well in the
past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient
trouble or misinterpreting them when they do
appear.

(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action,
especially one that has worked well in the past,
is likely to make an executive miss signs of
incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they
do appear.

答案是E,我不明白为什么,求NN相助啊,抱拳啦~!!!O(∩_∩)O
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/8/12 17:11:40)




这道题是2个月前做的,今天再看,我不会这么解释。

这道题,在曼哈顿网站里RON有具体的解释,确实突破点主要是代词+idiom(likely的使用)

可是最后选E用being的原因,皆在于error > wordy。 being存在仅仅是wordy不是error,你可以用他,但是必须最后用他。我记得曼哈顿书里说过一句话:you should notice this partten, but you can't fall in love with it. 永远把concise放在最后考虑

A。有错:RON解释说Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action这个说法有一种native speaker才能看出来的awkward,如果我把by an executive 先不看的话,是heavy commitment to a course of action. 因为根据意思to a course of action是修饰heavy commitment的,而不是by an executive的。根据目前在讨论的那张帖子,我根据曼哈顿书里的那个to do 结构不能修饰没有生命性名词表示目的的说法,这种表达是错误的:帖子见此:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-596729-1-1.html

此外:make it likely to do sth, 这个结构根据RON说表达不对,因为虽然有make it adj to do sth的说法,可是这个it是作为it reference指代后面的to do sth的,(见曼哈顿SC书P231)  ; 但是这里用likely做ADJ来表达就有问题了;likely的表达一般是:be likely to do sth,be likely that svo 所以这种make it likely to do的用法不对

B。 likely用法也错误---这个是错误,error,不是preference/wordy的问题;还有ones用法错应该是them;one是indefinite的指代,them是definite指代。根据曼哈顿的one解释,可以说:某人吃了很多巧克力中的某一块的时候,应该用one,而不是it,因为是某一块;当说这块味道如何的时候应该用it来指代这个one所表达的某一块。这个it就特定指代这个某一块;所以这里的ones毫无意义,这里是特定指代,指代when they do appear的那些signals

C. if it has worked well in the past中的it指代有问题,it可以指代a course of action,同时也能够指代:incipient trouble ;不要以it不能指代介词中宾语为理由,认为it应该只能指代a course of action; 在C这个句子中committed to a course of action, 这个to是介词,因为TO+N,这个to是做介词用的,所以a course of action就是宾语了,所以既然两个都是宾语,IT指代就有问题了,属于有多个先行词的错误指代情况

D. makes them likely to 这个them用法错误, 不是idiom的用法,没有听到过make them adj to do sth的说法。此外makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear. 代词指代容易有连贯性,一连窜的them容易指代同一个先行词,那么make them中的them更加有问题

E。有being的wordy问题,但是没有语法错误,指代,idiom表达都对
-- by 会员 清飞扬 (2011/10/6 23:11:20)



我想问问哪里有曼哈顿网站里RON的解释呢?~~~
17#
发表于 2011-10-7 00:18:02 | 只看该作者
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/heavy-commitment-by-an-executive-to-a-course-of-action-t3173.html
18#
发表于 2011-10-7 00:42:31 | 只看该作者
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/heavy-commitment-by-an-executive-to-a-course-of-action-t3173.html
-- by 会员 清飞扬 (2011/10/7 0:18:02)



谢谢飞扬~~~~
19#
发表于 2011-10-8 03:40:17 | 只看该作者
谢谢飞扬。真是很认真。
关于E中being的使用。Ron的回答很清楚。在这里,being不是个修饰语,是个动名词。在这个句子中, "being committed" 就是句子的主语。
20#
发表于 2011-10-15 16:40:57 | 只看该作者
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/heavy-commitment-by-an-executive-to-a-course-of-action-t3173.html
-- by 会员 清飞扬 (2011/10/7 0:18:02)


我预感你将成为CD上语法板块有一个传奇。。。。
你的SC太强大了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 16:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部