Hku's business school is too regional. They don't pay faculty well so they can't hire the good ones. They are free riding on their under's reputation. No originality there.
Cuhk is better than hku and they also pay attention on china. But they still lag behind hkust due to it's legacy of lousy old faculties. Both Larry Lang and Leslie young are retiring. Even so, cuhk is way better than hku in it's bus sch
Tsinghua has no soul. the old tsinghua before 1949 was a great place. Their current faculty is the worst but due to political connection, they became prominent in media. However, they have no independent thinking and are laughingstocks globally. Qian yingyi is an exception rather than the norm.
Hi Grossman, I've got 3 questions, as you know things about CKGSB & CEIBS.
1) 9 years passed since CKGSB was founded, now do you think is possible for it to become a top 10 around 2012 or 2013? Why?
2) Actually is the same question. The future. As the further of CEIBS is predictable easily, so we would not spend time to discuss it. No doubt, CKGSB achieve great success in EMBA field, but MBA is not as successful as that, and also FMBA is totally a new things. So according to that, how do you feel about the future of CKGSB(maybe in 3-5 years)?
3) What is the real core competence of CKGSB? Faculty? No offense, but we can see the loss of the faculty, I mean does CKGSB relay on the star too much? Coz every time the star went away, could really break the CKGSB fans' heart, also impact their faith about CKGSB (I talked to few candidates who between the offers )
Quite frankly, a guy like me who has great interest about CKGSB, questions above should be the final ones.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-7-29 14:57:43
收藏
收藏
楼主
