ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Stock levels for domestic crude oil are far lower than in past years, leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly prompted by colder-than-normal temperatures.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3384|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP-83 一个关于平行省略的问题!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-26 17:30:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
83. (29013-!-item-!-188;#058&003802)



Stock levels for domestic crude oil are far lower than in past years, leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly prompted by colder-than-normal temperatures.



(A) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly



(B) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be



(C) leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies that are disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand as was possibly



(D) resulting in the fact that domestic oil prices are vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly



(E) resulting in the fact of domestic oil prices that are vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be

答案是B,我之前看到or后没有补出to就直接排除
但是语法笔记的补充说明说B中的并列结构第二个TO和第一个TO功能一样,可以省略
瞬间我就凌乱了...这尼玛不是坑爹么,难道是我做的还不够多?平行结构介词不是一定要补出吗?
求点拨...
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-26 17:35:48 | 只看该作者
B中的to不是省略了么?的确功能一样可以省略啊……没太明白LZ在说什么……
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-26 17:40:34 | 只看该作者
可以的吗?我之前做的并列结构的题这种介词一般都要平行的呀 难道是我做的还不够多?能劳烦详细解释一下吗?
地板
发表于 2011-7-26 17:48:22 | 只看该作者
我的理解是介词的省略与否不是关键语法点,也就是说如果存在两个选项完全一致只有省略介词的区别时,如果介词功能一致按照简洁性原则省略的最优,但是这种情况比较少见吧。就比如说这个题考的明显是平行两部分形式上的对称,即使没有意识到to有没有省略也不影响做题。

还有,我个人记忆里介词省略的比较多……为什么记忆有偏差呢……不过话说我做题也不多,眼下找不到类似题目,remain open
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-26 17:55:08 | 只看该作者
明白一些了!就像n that be done一样 简化为佳 但不是绝对错误点对吧?不过还是先remain open吧
6#
发表于 2011-7-27 00:09:36 | 只看该作者
这道题的考点是平行结构。 Being disrupted 和 demand growth 不平行。 一个是动做, 一个是名词。  Disruption 和 demand growth 是平行。
7#
发表于 2011-7-27 00:21:16 | 只看该作者
to do中的to可以省略的。
8#
发表于 2011-7-27 09:36:00 | 只看该作者
LZ 平行对称结构中 只有to可以省略(当功能一样的时候)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 10:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部