大全 83

OO335722076

83. Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when each of the three major networks broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.
(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each
答案是e。 之前不明白c为啥错
看了很多讨论贴
首先有大牛说是逻辑问题
＂c表明 如果broad 就super 也就是说如果不broad 就不super 这样意思上明显没e好＂
   我觉得首先 如果b则s 并不是说明不b就不s 逻辑上倒退的话 成立的是逆否命题即不s则不b 而不是上述的否命题不b就不s 否命题不一定成立 这样一看是不是又觉得c的逻辑没问题呢？
   其次我认为即使c有逻辑问题（本来没有）那又有什么影响呢 就像阅读题提问：作者观点是什么？即使作者的观点是地球是方的 咱们还不是选这个？ 如果有一道sc 意思是太阳东边升起 然后下面选项都是同样意思只是有语法错误那是不是都不选呢？ 咱们是在sc 不是argument 而且og里面关于sc的考点里跟本就没有逻辑是否合理的考点 只有是否出现歧义。
    之后看见一个g友贴的回复 是老外解释的 说因为c中的if不能跟can 而应该跟will 我认为这个解释有说服力，不知道大家怎么想啊，是不是有其他的想法呢

OO335722076

up

OO335722076

up

OO335722076

up'

dreamistrue

First of all, there's the "if..." construction. if taken literally (as you MUST do), the sentence implies only that television can be "superficial" IN THE SPECIFIC EVENT THAT all 3 major networks broadcast the same political statement.

That is not the correct meaning. The correct meaning is the general statement that television can be superficial, followed by one particular example (i.e., the example of the 3 major networks broadcasting the same statement at the same time).