ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: arundhati
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD7-15

[复制链接]
71#
发表于 2007-2-22 16:14:00 | 只看该作者
Whose 既可以指人,也可以指物。当指物时,它相当于of which.
例句:
1。Please show me the book whose cover is red.
=Please show me the book of which cover is red.
72#
发表于 2007-5-16 10:15:00 | 只看该作者

Actually, it is just a problem of tense. D


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-16 10:15:14编辑过]
73#
发表于 2007-5-29 09:09:00 | 只看该作者
抓大放小......考场上哪有时间想这么多阿......
74#
发表于 2007-6-11 23:14:00 | 只看该作者
又是一个营养贴~~
75#
发表于 2007-6-25 17:10:00 | 只看该作者

被whose欺骗了,唉,当时在BD间犹豫好久呢。

76#
发表于 2007-10-7 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zxz1818在2006-11-17 0:20:00的发言:

This is exactly the point. At a cost 修饰 projects.

a cost 可以是任何的cost

而且容易误解为修饰proposed, CITY花费什么代价来raiseat a cost of,而原文意思是工程的cost raise

77#
发表于 2007-11-2 01:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sunnybest在2005-11-3 4:38:00的发言:

同意49楼的解释.

at a cost 确实有歧义,即可认为是修饰projects, 也可认为修饰city.

OG212解释了这种类似的修饰歧义的问题

212. The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system.

(A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving

(B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve

(C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving

(D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improving(A)

(E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve

OG的对E这种结构的解释为:with the aim... improve can easily be construed as referring to the Baldrick Manufacturing Company and so does not refer unequivocally to policy

with the aim 与此题中的at a cost成份类似,估计ETS会认为有歧义吧.

请各位NN指正.

如果说介词词组
        
会导致ambiguity 歧异问题

那么
        
关于OG11th 78

Visitors to the park have often looked into the leafy canopy and seen monkey sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.
                 

这里的with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline 用来修饰sleeping

那不也和visitors 原题主语有产生歧异?

因此
        
个人浅见
        
应该是
        
惯用法上? At a cost 应该+of Ving ?

请大家多多讨论
        
谢谢^^

78#
发表于 2008-1-27 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

各位NN

不知道为什么要用will,如何体现将来时呢?请赐教,谢谢

79#
发表于 2008-2-7 14:11:00 | 只看该作者

O yu.

80#
发表于 2008-2-14 06:27:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得so high that从句是不能独立存在于raising分词结构里的. 可以参考OG205的D为什么错.

although从句是independent clause, 不能独立存在, 必须有一个dependent clause.

即He is happy although he has no money是完整的, 而being happy although he has no money是错误的. 所以OG205说although不能存在于一个介词结构中.

同理, so ... that后面的that从句应该也不能单独存在与一个分词短语里.

This is wrong. See the OG 163

163. Found throughout Central and South America, sloths hang from trees by long rubbery limbs and sleep fifteen hours a day. moving infrequently enough that two species of algae grow on its coat and between its toes.
                

(A)  sloths hang from trees by long rubbery limbs and sleep fifteen hours a day, moving infre­quently enough

(B)   sloths hang from trees by long rubbery limbs, they sleep fifteen hours a day, and with such infrequent movements
                

(C)  sloths use their long rubbery limbs to hang from trees, sleep fifteen hours a day, and move so infrequently
                

(D)  the sloth hangs from trees by its long rubbery
                limbs, sleeping fifteen hours a day and
                moving so infrequently

(E)   the sloth hangs from trees by its long rubbery
                limbs, sleeps fifteen hours a day, and it moves
                infrequently enough
                

***************************

牛啊,搞懂了2个问题;

以前也看到og上这205题,说although不能单独用,但是不是很理解,看了rhod的例子,恍然大悟啊.

第二个牛牛举出OG160的例子,让我了解,so that结构是可以用在分词里面的!多谢

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 13:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部