ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2965|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

FT VS PT

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-15 10:28:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
PT MBA的含金量比 FT的真的差很远吗?
为什么呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-15 14:46:47 | 只看该作者
FT含金量肯定高吧
但是放弃目前的工作去读,难啊
板凳
发表于 2011-6-15 18:45:01 | 只看该作者
let's think about whether the school would hire a separate set of profs for FT and PT...

in reality, a single prof. would most likely teach both FT and PT courses...
and for PT, students are generally older, more mature, more industry experience, more connections, more networks... the only drawback is the PT students would need to balance work and study... therefore the workload for FT and PT might be different... but that doesn't mean one is better than the other. on the other hand, the needs for FT and PT are different...  

PT students generally like the prof. could offer real life solution for solving the student's real life problems... if the prof. only talking theories and cases, that wouldn't do much of a great job...
地板
发表于 2011-6-15 21:20:55 | 只看该作者
PT MBA的含金量比 FT的真的差很远吗?
为什么呢?
-- by 会员 frankiehan2010 (2011/6/15 10:28:35)

文凭是一样的,关键是你要什么。全职读机会成本很高
5#
发表于 2011-6-20 22:21:53 | 只看该作者
同意chongwaho的说法,其实个人觉得如同大学里面的专业一样,很多人到了社会以后从事的也不是本专业,无所谓好坏,重要的是学校里里面是需要学会思考的方法以及独立思考的能力。人生一辈子都在学习,NEVER STOP。 SO PT AND FT,不必太拘泥。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-8 12:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部