gwd 7-4,39

kaochieh

我一開始選E, 但想想應該是B!

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.  

b. movies—fewer than have been

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—
                        (Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark )fewer (people) than(=who) have been killed by bee stings.  
                        

1. — 指" 也就是說 ..."

2. have been killed by...fewer than have been killed by 時態相同, 完美對秤!!

3. people [c] used as the plural of 'person' , 可用fewer修飾

e.movies, fewer than the ones

1) Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies,
                    (and (seven people this century) are )fewer (people) than the ones
                    killed by bee stings. 

2) Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies,
                            (which is)fewer (movies) than the ones
                            killed by bee stings.

1. ones 可指 people 或 movies(惟語意不通)

2. "the" ones "這些"人, 原來的seven people 並沒有指定哪7個人, 

     分詞構句 或 簡化形容詞子句 混淆!

     倘若 指 原句的seven people (killed by the great white shark)又被killed by bee stings 怪!

3.時態不一致!!

sweetbeer

According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.

(A) equivalent to the enrollment of
(B) the equivalent of those enrolled in
(C) equal to those who are enrolled in
(D) as many as the enrollment of
(E) as many as are enrolled in (e)

The comparison in E, the best choice, is logical because people is understood as the subject of are enrolled

这是OG里一道题，同这道题完全一样，比较对象people因为完全一样被省略

tangzimo

头像好……

hopelanxyn

If one were to cross-reference a similar ratio with the numbers of bombs dropped in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last three years, even with a liberal error bar one would come up in each case with a total number of civilian fatalities due to bombing in each country in at most the low hundreds: far fewer than have been killed, for instance, by insurgent suicide bombers in both countries. This does not mean that Allied forces are not accidentally killing larger numbers of civilians in other ways: attack helicopters, artillery, small arms fire at checkpoints, all must be taking a regrettable if unintended toll, as well. But it does suggest that the aerial contribution to the civilian death tolls in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last three years cannot be a major component of, say, the 4,000 total Afghan deaths reported by the UN and Associated Press last year, or the 600,000 excess deaths in Iraq since 2003 recently estimated by researchers in the Lancet.

http://www.snappingturtle.net/flit/archives/2007_04.html

网上找到的,应该选B

网上找到的,应该选B

Jocelynsu

以下是引用hopelanxyn在2007-10-26 0:04:00的发言：

If one were to cross-reference a similar ratio with the numbers of bombs dropped in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last three years, even with a liberal error bar one would come up in each case with a total number of civilian fatalities due to bombing in each country in at most the low hundreds: far fewer than have been killed, for instance, by insurgent suicide bombers in both countries. This does not mean that Allied forces are not accidentally killing larger numbers of civilians in other ways: attack helicopters, artillery, small arms fire at checkpoints, all must be taking a regrettable if unintended toll, as well. But it does suggest that the aerial contribution to the civilian death tolls in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last three years cannot be a major component of, say, the 4,000 total Afghan deaths reported by the UN and Associated Press last year, or the 600,000 excess deaths in Iraq since 2003 recently estimated by researchers in the Lancet.

http://www.snappingturtle.net/flit/archives/2007_04.html

网上找到的,应该选B

网上找到的,应该选B

网上找到的,应该选B

呵呵，我也google到了差不多的http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/07/international/middleeast/07iraq.html?pagewanted=print

Attacks on Sunday and Monday have left a handful of people dead, far fewer than have been killed in daily attacks during the past month.

less和fewer都可以修饰人的，但是这题主要考时态，平行才好，呵呵

bananaleaf

不知道我解答这个题的思路对不对：

这个题目主要是根据逻辑确定句子主干：Erie Canal connected the Hudson River

很容易混淆的选项都是把主句和修饰成分（状语）的关系破环了。识别主语和谓语动词是关键。

 

lydiar_020

B是对的。or用的很好。从逻辑上讲，这条运河很少有地方宽40或者深12，没有什么不对。A的意思是这条运河很少有地方宽40且深12，限定条件更多一些而已。

请问，B这样一改，不就把原文的意思改掉了吗？

aomeisoft7

我一開始選E, 但想想應該是B!
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

b. movies—fewer than have been

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—
                       (Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark )fewer (people) than(=who) have been killed by bee stings.
                       

1. — 指" 也就是說 ..."
2. have been killed by...fewer than have been killed by 時態相同, 完美對秤!!
3. people [c] used as the plural of 'person' , 可用fewer修飾



e.movies, fewer than the ones

1) Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies,
                   (and (seven people this century) are )fewer (people) than the ones
                   killed by bee stings.

2) Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies,
                           (which is)fewer (movies) than the ones
                           killed by bee stings.

1. ones 可指 people 或 movies(惟語意不通)
2. "the" ones "這些"人, 原來的seven people 並沒有指定哪7個人,
    分詞構句 或 簡化形容詞子句 混淆!
    倘若 指 原句的seven people (killed by the great white shark)又被killed by bee stings 怪!
3.時態不一致!!

-- by 会员 kaochieh (2007/2/25 21:00:00)

这个解释非常的好！！必须顶

sunshengkun666

一题选b。。。ones指代错误