ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 麻集爱
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 8-11,41

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2004-7-16 06:33:00 | 只看该作者
感觉是有,就像句子as sb1 did, sb2 did not这里的句子理解sb1就是肯定的,在想表达同sb2一样否定的意思时,as sb1 did就被认为不可接受,而且意思上as there are 理解成肯定,感觉更合理些。
22#
发表于 2004-7-16 07:14:00 | 只看该作者

there are legal limits for cob as there are for monkfish. = there are legal limits for cob as there are legal limits for monkfish.

there are no legal limts for cob as there are for monkfish. = there are no legal limts for cob as there are no legal limits for monkfish.

我认为这样的补出才是合理的,而且,as A do, B donot do我怎么觉得很别扭啊,as这里不是应该表明类似性么?

继续请教!

23#
发表于 2004-7-16 07:29:00 | 只看该作者

我只是觉得否定成分可能不能这样省,不过也不是很清楚,还要多找例子才能说明问题。

24#
发表于 2004-7-16 11:28:00 | 只看该作者

171, Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.

(A) like adults

(B) unlike an adult

(C) as adults

(D) as adults do

(E) as an adult

这个大全的例子,答案是D。另外,as是方式状语连词。

25#
发表于 2004-7-17 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

不错,这个例子的确能够有参考价值,问题是这里用的是not而不是no,not是修饰do的,所以后面用do就能够理解,但是no是修饰名词的。

26#
发表于 2004-7-17 17:29:00 | 只看该作者

这题我记得在哪做过啊,但是我搜索找不到……哪位有同感的找一下~~~~~~

我选E,大家说E为什么不对啊,看了半天没看出来

27#
发表于 2004-7-22 03:29:00 | 只看该作者

同意A,但认为They指代fish,

28#
发表于 2004-8-7 18:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用gmat700+在2004-7-16 2:40:00的发言:


我的理解是:法律没有限制monkfish的捕捞数量,而对cod and haddock法律上就有捕捞数量的限制,所以monkfish现在被过度捕捞。


同意。我选a

29#
发表于 2004-9-7 16:43:00 | 只看该作者

Q11:
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that
can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of
monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion
through overfishing.
B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or
haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being
overfished.
C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not
for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish,
which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching
monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
Answer:

我做题时选了A,排除C的理由是:
C中的which指代了前面整个句子,即“对可捕鱼尺寸上的限制”contributes to...。而在T和G语法中,ETS较严谨的做法是which优先靠前指代--即指代最邻近的名词,按此原则,这里的which就指monfish,这在句意上不通。
A中将前面的情况用抽象词circumstance代替,我觉得更优,并且印象上在天山真题之类里也有过类似的情况。

Q41:
When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000
existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.
A. there are less than one-quarter that many
B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many
C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount
D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount
E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount

这题我选C。第一遍时的感觉。省略时用抽象名字that之类更好,而不能用these, those,这里many觉得和these,those属于同一类,因此更喜欢that amout。

欢迎指正!

30#
发表于 2004-9-16 00:53:00 | 只看该作者

41的D为什么不对?谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 03:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部