og 142 关于限定性修饰3种形式的差别

我爱宝宝

142. In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of marketing, the Coca-Cola company in July 1985 yielded to thousands of irate consumers demanding that it should bring back the original Coke formula.

(A)  demanding that it should

(B)   demanding it to

(C)  and their demand to

(D)  who demanded that it

(E)   who demanded it to

Choice D, the best answer, uses the grammatically correct expression demanded that it bring back, in which demanded that it is followed by the subjunctive verb bring.

Choice A incorrectly uses should bring rather than bring:

demanding that already conveys the idea of "should," and at any rate a modal（情态）

auxiliary （辅助）verb, such as should or must, cannot grammatically follow the

expression demanded that. Similarly,

B and E use the ungrammatical expression demanding/demanded it to.

In C, the expression yielded to... customers and their demand to bring... unnecessarily states that the company yielded to the customers as well as to their demand.

This expression also fails to specify that the company is expected to bring back the original formula.

我的问题是如果选项A中的should去掉的话，下面三种限定性修饰有什么区别呢？

1.        thousands of irate consumers demanding that

2.        thousands of irate consumers with the demand that

3.     thousands of irate consumers who demanded that

谢谢大家帮助。

rt316

1 and 3, which can be used here, are better than 2, which is wordy.

The difference betten 1 and 3 is that 1 emphasize ongoing action but 3 not.

我爱宝宝

谢谢stoneren，这就是全部的区别了吗？

rt316

以下是引用我爱宝宝在2004-6-17 1:09:00的发言：

谢谢stoneren，这就是全部的区别了吗？

哈哈，这是我个人的理解，算是我认为的全部的区别吧。对于分词作定语和定从作定语，我建议你还是将OG里的题分类后看看，应该有所帮助。

ca3ltoys

那1和3哪个更好呢?

关于分词与定语从句的区别还有一条见OG237

237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.

(A)  may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other

(B)  may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other

(C)  are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other

(D)  are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other

(E)   are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other

Choice E, the best answer Choice C Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various loca­tions.(现在分词与从句的区别).

但根据此条原则看不出在142中有什么区别,请帮忙看看.谢谢.!!!

rt316

其实，如果不是选择而是填空，142那题我还是会填：who demanded that。因为从时态上讲，demand仅仅是发生在过去的事件。

可以参考OG80/142/144/167/258，其中，167的时态比较特殊，可以自己分析一下原因。

我笨，我努力

同意stoneren。新东方老师说：doing的形式一定要小心，其成为正确答案的比率低。我这个是上课的笔记

1.        thousands of irate consumers demanding that 指是强调动作的重复性，行为和方式

3.     thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 强调动作的发生，状态和结果

bigdog1220

以下是引用我笨，我努力在2004-6-18 6:42:00的发言：

同意stoneren。新东方老师说：doing的形式一定要小心，其成为正确答案的比率低。我这个是上课的笔记

1.        thousands of irate consumers demanding that 指是强调动作的重复性，行为和方式

3.     thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 强调动作的发生，状态和结果

那么请问以下两句有什么分别? when to use "who" and when not to? I always get confused.  请 NN 指点.

- thousands of irate consumers demanded that

- thousands of irate consumers who demanded that

carina

- thousands of irate consumers demanded that 是consumers 被要求

thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 是consumers 要求

barmecide

demand sb/sth to do sth

没有这个用法吗？我的印象中好象有这个用法吧？手头没有动词用法的参考资料，麻烦NN帮忙解惑。多谢！！！！！