gwd 12 - 31.32

LES

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

E中主语为letters, 谓语是outnumer, 所以句子提炼后就是letters outnumber her letters to anyone else.

逻辑错误，letters 本身数量上不会超过，而是写于一长段时间内的信件的累积才使其数量上超过......，

注意限定与非限定修饰的区别。

cranberry

a / e

麻集爱

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else. E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber E中主语为letters, 谓语是outnumer, 所以句子提炼后就是letters outnumber her letters to anyone else. 逻辑错误，letters 本身数量上不会超过，而是写于一长段时间内的信件的累积才使其数量上超过......， 注意限定与非限定修饰的区别

不同意 they outnumber us three to one .  ==> A ounumber B ( 多少多少)

不选a 因为outnumbering离主语过远,如果是做伴随也应该放在句首.

欢迎指教 lsemm 很厉害的

LES

你举的例子不错。可能是偶的表达有点问题。

根据句意，这题的考点就是“前面整个一段话对后面造成的影响”-XDF语。现在分词做状语表结果，请参考OG154和259。

麻集爱

同时正是由于 les mm 提出的问题更使得outnumbering有修饰主语做伴随状语同时又可作修饰整句产生之嫌

这样子是不对地~  我开始胡说八道了. 但是 e确实没有错嘛

麻集爱

letters1  ( 积累了多长时间的letter) outnumber letters2 ( 给谁的)

两个定语修饰两个不同对比方.

kingsoft

     E将原来句子的状语变为谓语，句子重心大偏

     肯定没有A好

麻集爱

还有没有其他解释？　除了重心这个　比较迷惑的＂错误＂

kingsoft

      做题目是比较

      有些选项未必错，如果你承认A比E好，为什么不选A？？

麻集爱

我没说我承认错了，我是问你除了这个小巴并　，你还能给出更ｐｏｗｅｒｆｕｌ的证据么？　

承让了．